2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10610-014-9249-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dutch Drug Policy from a Regulatory Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This framework also allowed us to include laboratory confirmed STIs, whereas many other studies rely on self-reported STI or only on sexual behavior (4,6,7,9). Since drug policies are liberal in the Netherlands compared to other countries, drug use might be more openly discussed, making underreporting less likely in our study population (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework also allowed us to include laboratory confirmed STIs, whereas many other studies rely on self-reported STI or only on sexual behavior (4,6,7,9). Since drug policies are liberal in the Netherlands compared to other countries, drug use might be more openly discussed, making underreporting less likely in our study population (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1970s, the Netherlands introduced a regulatory regime for narcotic drugs that distinguishes less harmful, or 'soft', drugs from unacceptably harmful, or 'hard', drugs (Spapens et al 2015). Cannabis was categorised as a soft drug.…”
Section: Dutch Coffeeshop Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local authorities tend to "role up their sleeves." Fijnaut (2014) observes that within the European Union, especially since the introduction of open borders, it is difficult for countries to apply policies by themselves because of the risk of cross-border organized crime (see also Spapens, Müller, and van de Bunt 2015). This could lead to more consensus between member states and to adaptations in Dutch drug policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%