2013
DOI: 10.1097/pat.0b013e328361429b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of immune cells and macrophages in the endometrium of women with recurrent reproductive failure. III: Further observations and reference ranges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
47
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of research to date on NK cell function in the reproductive tract focuses on their role during embryo implantation and placentation within the uterus [44]. It is important to mention that the majority of primate uterine NK cells are CD56 bright , and increased numbers of CD56 dim NK cells in the uterus are associated with reproductive failure [45]. Notably, a subpopulation of primate NK cells is CD16 + CD56 dim [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of research to date on NK cell function in the reproductive tract focuses on their role during embryo implantation and placentation within the uterus [44]. It is important to mention that the majority of primate uterine NK cells are CD56 bright , and increased numbers of CD56 dim NK cells in the uterus are associated with reproductive failure [45]. Notably, a subpopulation of primate NK cells is CD16 + CD56 dim [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although they were initially reported as absent in proliferative endometrium based on histochemical stains to detect cytoplasmic granules, CD56+ cells are detectable, albeit in relatively low numbers . The increase in numbers is seen from day 22 onwards (Russell et al 2011(Russell et al , 2013, and at least some of the increase can be accounted for by local proliferation. The phenotype of uNK cells in non-pregnant endometrium has not been investigated to the same extent as those from early pregnancy decidua, where distinct gestational age differences in phenotype and function have been reported.…”
Section: Relationship Of Unk Cells In Non-pregnant Endometrium and Dementioning
confidence: 95%
“…between zona spongiosum and zona compactum), an initial step should be to establish consistent methodology for quantifi cation of uNK cell numbers in endometrium (Lash et al 2014 ). Furthermore, the date of assessment may vary from LH+6 to LH+9 in different studies, refl ecting a cycle stage when uNK cell numbers can vary dramatically (Russell et al 2011(Russell et al , 2013. It is essential that sampling is on a specifi c day of the cycle or that 'normal' ranges for uNK cell numbers are established in large subject groups.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Unk Assessment In Recurrent Reprodumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numbers of uNK cells increase exponentially as the menstrual cycle progresses (Bulmer & Lash 2005;Russell et al 2011;Russell et al 2013) and therefore timing ofthe biopsy is critical or a reference range of 'normal' uNK cell numbers throughout the menstrual cycle needs to be established. However, before this can be addressed a method which provides consistency between different centres is required and this study has addressed this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also no clear definition of a "normal range" of uNK cell numbers, partly because obtaining endometrium from normal fertile control women is difficult. In addition, for practical reasons many centres sample over a 3 day period (LH+6-LH+8 or LH+7-LH+9), but during this time 100 period uNK cell numbers increase exponentially (Russell et al 2011;Russell et al 2013), which may skew clinical results dependent on the "reference range" being used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%