1993
DOI: 10.1057/jors.1993.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution Free Newsboy Problem: Review and Extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
128
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 652 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above model (3) reduces to the profit function of the classical newsvendor problem (Gallego & Moon, 1993) when K=l=l1=0 and q =1, reduces to the model considered in Moon and Choi (1995) when l1= l = 0, and reduces to the model considered in Liao et al (2011) when l1 = 0.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above model (3) reduces to the profit function of the classical newsvendor problem (Gallego & Moon, 1993) when K=l=l1=0 and q =1, reduces to the model considered in Moon and Choi (1995) when l1= l = 0, and reduces to the model considered in Liao et al (2011) when l1 = 0.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose only a partial information about the distribution F of D is available in the sense that F  Ŧ, where Ŧ is a certain family of distributions with a finite mean m and standard deviation s. Since the distribution F of D is unknown we want to minimize (4) against the worst possible distribution in Ŧ. To this end, we need the following results cited by Moon and Choi (1995), which are attributed to Gallego and Moon (1993):…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to solve this problem, [2] first established the solution of a distribution free newsboy problem with known mean and standard deviation of lead time demand. [3] derived an easy proof of Scarf's [2] ordering rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding purchase quantities ( ) ( )( ) , derived for the standard n = 1 case; see [7] [12] [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%