Babayigit, S. (2015) The relations between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension in children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2): A multigroup structural analysis. Reading and Writing, 28 (4). pp. 527-544. ISSN 0922-4777 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/25337We recommend you cite the published version. The publisher's URL is: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9536-x
Refereed: YesThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145?014?9536?x Disclaimer UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. UWE makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.UWE makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. UWE accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement.
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT.Published: Babayiğit, S. (2015). The relations between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension in children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2): a multigroup structural analysis. Reading and Writing, 28(4) This study compared the reading and oral language skills of children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2), and examined whether the strength of the relationship between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension was invariant (equivalent) across the two groups. The participants included 183 L1 and L2 children (M = 9;7 years, SD = 3.64 months) in England. As anticipated, there was a significant L1 advantage for oral language (i.e., vocabulary, verbal working memory, sentence repetition) and reading comprehension but not for word reading. Findings from the multigroup structural analysis indicated that the strength of relationships between oral language and reading was relatively invariant across the two groups.,Oral language was the strongest predictor of reading comprehension levels in both groups.Finally, the weaker English oral language skills explained the lower performance of L2 learners on reading comprehension. Together the results underscored the importance of supporting oral language development in minority language learners.
Structural AnalysisA substantial body of research evidence suggests that whereas word level reading skills develop relatively rapidly, achieving age-appropriate oral language (e.g., vocabulary) and reading comprehension skills in a majority language continues to be a challenge for a significant proportion of learners from minority language backgrounds who speak a language other than the language of instruction at home (Lesaux, Geva, Koda, Siegel, & Shanahan, 20...