1961
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(61)90060-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
259
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 643 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
259
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gehan 2-stage design was used for estimating the response rate. 24 The sample size calculation was based on the double requirement of being able to stop the study early if the response rate was lower than 20% and of estimating the response rate with a standard error of <0.1, with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 95%. After the first stage comprising 14 patients had been completed, safety and efficacy were assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gehan 2-stage design was used for estimating the response rate. 24 The sample size calculation was based on the double requirement of being able to stop the study early if the response rate was lower than 20% and of estimating the response rate with a standard error of <0.1, with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 95%. After the first stage comprising 14 patients had been completed, safety and efficacy were assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using standard statistical methods (Gehan, 1961), we used a 2-stage design in this study. If no CR or PR was noted in the first 14 patients, a response rate of 420% could be excluded with 95% confidence and accrual was stopped.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MTD was defined as the dose level below the level at which two of three patients experienced DLT, provided no more than two of the six experienced DLT at that level. For phase II of the study, a Gehan 2 stage design (Gehan, 1961) was used. To detect a response rate of 15% with a probability of a type I error of 5% and a type II error of 10% required the enrolment of 21 patients in stage 1.…”
Section: Study Design and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%