1999
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.84.2.386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Detection of Malingering

Abstract: A 60-item paper-and-pencil inventory showed a 98% "hit-rate" in distinguishing between honest and simulated malingering protocols produced by 29 nonclinical subjects who took the inventory in both the honest and faked conditions. When instructed to take the Wildman Symptom Cheklist "as if applying for some kind of disability compensation," subjects endorsed a significantly higher number of the self-statements which appear clinically unbelievable. Independent replication is now required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 2360 students from 71 classes participated in the study. Students were excluded when unreliable answers were suspected based on outlying scores (z-scores greater than 3.29 [34]) on the Wildman Symptom Checklist, a scale consisting of bogus symptoms, such as “The buzzing in my ears keeps switching from the left to the right” [35, 36], ( n  = 31) or based on a specific pattern in their answers on the maltreatment questionnaire (e.g., all questions answered with the highest possible score; n  = 23). In addition, students who were older than 17 ( n  = 331) or younger than 12 years ( n  = 2) or with missing data concerning age ( n  = 123) were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 2360 students from 71 classes participated in the study. Students were excluded when unreliable answers were suspected based on outlying scores (z-scores greater than 3.29 [34]) on the Wildman Symptom Checklist, a scale consisting of bogus symptoms, such as “The buzzing in my ears keeps switching from the left to the right” [35, 36], ( n  = 31) or based on a specific pattern in their answers on the maltreatment questionnaire (e.g., all questions answered with the highest possible score; n  = 23). In addition, students who were older than 17 ( n  = 331) or younger than 12 years ( n  = 2) or with missing data concerning age ( n  = 123) were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Amerikaanse psychologen Wildman en Wildman (1999) construeerden een lijst met 30 onwaarschijnlijke symptomen en kenmerken die nauwelijks overlappen met de eerder genoemde sirs (Rogers et al, 1992) en sims (Merckelbach & Smith, 2003).…”
Section: Wildman Symptom Checklistunclassified
“…In hun oorspronkelijke doch ietwat karige onderzoek combineerden Wildman en Wildman (1999) de 30 checklistitems met evenzoveel realistische items (bijvoorbeeld 'mijn spieren doen pijn als ik lang gelopen of gerend heb' en 'verschillende keren per jaar loop ik een verkoudheid op'). 4 Deze verzameling namen ze vervolgens af bij twee groepen: controleproefpersonen en simulanten die werden geïnstrueerd om zich te gedragen alsof ze een uitkering veilig wilden stellen.…”
Section: Wildman Symptom Checklistunclassified
“…Hopefully, however, she or he will have access to reports, such as from treating physicians. Also, In both the physical and mental health fields, an evaluator may choose to use the Wildman Symptom Checklist (Wildman & Wildman, 1999; in an effort to identify persons who are claiming to suffer from bogus physical and psychiatric symptoms, as well as presenting themselves as possessing an unrealistically high level of morality. This brief, self-administered instrument along with scoring and interpretive instructions is presented as Appendix A to this article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%