2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The degree of cortical plasticity correlates with cognitive performance in patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results can show the role of functional reorganization in compensating for the damage and abnormalities in these cases. Moreover, results from a recent study showed a correlation between cortical plasticity and cognitive impairment in which the plasticity is reduced in cases with cognitive impairment compared to the cases with preserved cognitive function, and second, generally, the RRMS group did not show reduced cortical plasticity compared to the control group (Balloff et al, 2022). Although this study used a specific approach to investigate cortical reorganization and does not illustrate the difference between RRMS patients with normal cases, it shows that in RRMS cases without cognitive impairment, brain cortical reorganization compensates for structural damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results can show the role of functional reorganization in compensating for the damage and abnormalities in these cases. Moreover, results from a recent study showed a correlation between cortical plasticity and cognitive impairment in which the plasticity is reduced in cases with cognitive impairment compared to the cases with preserved cognitive function, and second, generally, the RRMS group did not show reduced cortical plasticity compared to the control group (Balloff et al, 2022). Although this study used a specific approach to investigate cortical reorganization and does not illustrate the difference between RRMS patients with normal cases, it shows that in RRMS cases without cognitive impairment, brain cortical reorganization compensates for structural damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We will apply TMS single pulses [ 74 ] via figure-eight coil (C-B60; inner diameter: 35mm, outer diameter: 75mm), connected to the MagPro R20 (MagVenture User Guide, United Kingdom edition, MagVenture A/S, Denmark). The coil will be oriented tangentially over the contralateral motor area of the brain, relative to the target muscle (i.e., APB), with a posterolateral handle pointing in approximately 45 degrees angle to the sagittal plane, as a result to induce current in a posterior-anterior direction in the brain [ 75 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 15, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.14.22277636 doi: medRxiv preprint motor area of the brain, relative to the target muscle (i.e., Abductor Pollicis Brevis), with a posterolateral handle pointing in approximately 45 degrees angle to the sagittal plane, as a result to induce current in a posterior-anterior direction in the brain (73).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will apply TMS single pulses (72) via figure-eight coil (C-B60; inner diameter: 35mm, outer diameter: 75mm), connected to the MagPro R20 (MagVenture User Guide, United Kingdom edition, MagVenture A/S, Denmark). The coil will be oriented tangentially over the contralateral motor area of the brain, relative to the target muscle (i.e., Abductor Pollicis Brevis), with a posterolateral handle pointing in approximately 45 degrees angle to the sagittal plane, as a result to induce current in a posterior-anterior direction in the brain (73).…”
Section: Data Acquisition Of Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation