2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.5.1327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dark side of visual awareness in sport: Inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IB has theoretical importance, highlighting the extent to which our attention determines our perception, and profound practical implications, through its contribution to understanding incidents such as Blooked-but-failed-to-see^road crashes (Beanland, Lenné, & Rößger, 2015). IB has been consistently demonstrated in both computerised displays (Beanland & Pammer, 2010a, b;Mack & Rock, 1998;Most et al, 2001) and naturalistic stimuli (Furley, Memmert, & Heller, 2010;Neisser, 1979;Simons, 2010;Simons & Chabris, 1999). The archetypal IB experiment entails an attention-consuming primary task, often presented in isolation for several trials before an unexpected stimulus is added during the critical inattention trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IB has theoretical importance, highlighting the extent to which our attention determines our perception, and profound practical implications, through its contribution to understanding incidents such as Blooked-but-failed-to-see^road crashes (Beanland, Lenné, & Rößger, 2015). IB has been consistently demonstrated in both computerised displays (Beanland & Pammer, 2010a, b;Mack & Rock, 1998;Most et al, 2001) and naturalistic stimuli (Furley, Memmert, & Heller, 2010;Neisser, 1979;Simons, 2010;Simons & Chabris, 1999). The archetypal IB experiment entails an attention-consuming primary task, often presented in isolation for several trials before an unexpected stimulus is added during the critical inattention trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual search data verified that the attention 14 of each instructional group (i.e. LOOSE and TTF) was directed towards the loose defender 15 and the first clear option, respectively. Moreover, a difference was found in the loose player 16 display where the LOOSE group attended to the loose defender more than the TTF group 17 and, conversely, the TTF group fixated on the player providing a strong central lead (A2D2) 18 more than the LOOSE group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three trials all had one common 13 feature -there was a strong lead drawing the decision selection of the TTF group, but it was 14 not considered the correct decision by the coaching panel. When visual search patterns were 15 analysed in these three scenarios, no differences were observed among the groups. We 16 therefore speculate that, despite attending to the same locations as the LOOSE group, the 17 TTF group did not make the correct decision due to adherence to their instruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations