1976
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780150082006
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Cross-Check Principle in Pediatric Audiometry

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
124
5
5
2

Citation Types

1
54
0
5

Year Published

1978
1978
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
102
13
13
1

Relationship

0
129

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 129 publications

(60 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

1
54
0
5
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Clinicians engage in critical analysis of the various test outcomes and whether they point to a common diagnoses or if there is discord among clinical outcomes in ambiguous cases. This is consistent with the premise underlying the “cross-check principle” purposed by Jerger and Hayes 16 over 40 years ago. The cross-check principle suggests that a single test should not be used in isolation to determine a diagnosis until its outcomes are confirmed by another independent test.…”
Section: Standard Audiologic/otolaryngology Tests
supporting
confidence: 89%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Clinicians engage in critical analysis of the various test outcomes and whether they point to a common diagnoses or if there is discord among clinical outcomes in ambiguous cases. This is consistent with the premise underlying the “cross-check principle” purposed by Jerger and Hayes 16 over 40 years ago. The cross-check principle suggests that a single test should not be used in isolation to determine a diagnosis until its outcomes are confirmed by another independent test.…”
Section: Standard Audiologic/otolaryngology Tests
supporting
confidence: 89%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A reliable consistency between the various tests findings, according to the Jerger & Hayes cross-check principle [15], emerged clearly in most cases during the follow-up, albeit at different times after birth. Total consistency between behavioral and electrophysiological test findings was not an absolute requirement for defining amelioration, however.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 61%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Diagnosis: an L-I function like the one shown is consistent with, but not diagnostic of, middle ear pathology. Impedance findings provide the cross-check and facilitate the correct identification of a mild conductive impairment (Jerger and Hayes, 1976). The otologic examination confirmed a diagnosis of otitis media, and the ABR following treatment was within normal limits.…”
Section: Peripheral Hearing Loss
mentioning
confidence: 86%