2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between gene expression of proinflammatory markers and bone formation during osseointegration with titanium implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
86
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
18
86
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo studies have shown that implants with combined nanoscale and microscale roughness enhance the long-term bone response 2 and promote bone-bonding and interface strength. [5][6][7] However, conclusive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the cell and tissue interactions with nanoscale topography, per se, is still lacking. This is, in part, due to the difficulty in isolating particular effects of nanotopography from other surface properties (eg, microtopography and surface chemistry).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies have shown that implants with combined nanoscale and microscale roughness enhance the long-term bone response 2 and promote bone-bonding and interface strength. [5][6][7] However, conclusive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the cell and tissue interactions with nanoscale topography, per se, is still lacking. This is, in part, due to the difficulty in isolating particular effects of nanotopography from other surface properties (eg, microtopography and surface chemistry).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, prosthesis characteristics (i.e., type of fixation) could not explain the variability in response to osteogenic stimuli. However, other studies showed that surface characteristics of implants can influence the inflammatory response to implant material and subsequently affect the expression of bone formation markers (e.g., BMP‐2 and ALP) 46, 47. Therefore, in future studies, the effect of different implant materials and surface characteristics on osteogenic differentiation of peri‐prosthetic tissue cells should be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of studies has been reported on improving of implant body surface topography and chemistry for shortening the period of establish osseointegration, and increase the success rate of implant in these patients [2][3][4] . On the other hands, some studies were reported about methods of improving the jaw bone as host side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%