2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between cellulose allomorphs (I and II) and conversion after removal of hemicellulose and lignin of lignocellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of crystalline cellulose is confirmed by the three following signals at 1456 cm -1 27,37,39,42 , 1372 cm - 1 19,22,42-44 and 1314 cm - 1 19,22,27,37-41,44 (bending mode vibration of C-H), while the amorphous content is justified by the presence of centered peak at 1425 cm -1 corresponding to CH 2 bending vibration (scissoring) 16,19,27,39,40,43 . According to Song et al 2015 42 and Zghari et al 2018 37 the crystalline cellulose I and cellulose II appear as doublet peak at 1430 cm -1 (strong band) and at 1420 cm -1 (weak band), respectively 44 . Furthermore, Hajji et al 2015 19 and Broda et al 2019 41 report that the decline in the intensities of the two bands at 1314 and 1163 cm -1 is correlated to the decrease of cellulose crystallinity (cellulose I).…”
Section: Ftir Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of crystalline cellulose is confirmed by the three following signals at 1456 cm -1 27,37,39,42 , 1372 cm - 1 19,22,42-44 and 1314 cm - 1 19,22,27,37-41,44 (bending mode vibration of C-H), while the amorphous content is justified by the presence of centered peak at 1425 cm -1 corresponding to CH 2 bending vibration (scissoring) 16,19,27,39,40,43 . According to Song et al 2015 42 and Zghari et al 2018 37 the crystalline cellulose I and cellulose II appear as doublet peak at 1430 cm -1 (strong band) and at 1420 cm -1 (weak band), respectively 44 . Furthermore, Hajji et al 2015 19 and Broda et al 2019 41 report that the decline in the intensities of the two bands at 1314 and 1163 cm -1 is correlated to the decrease of cellulose crystallinity (cellulose I).…”
Section: Ftir Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Concerning the band at 899 cm -1 ascribed to C-O-C stretching vibration mode of cellulose -(1-4)-glycosidic linkage is related to the content of amorphous cellulose which is completely in accordance with published literature studies 16,19,22,38,39,43 . However, this band is sensitive to changes, and so, a portion of amorphous cellulose content underwent crystallization due to mechanochemical processes 22 and/or to natural environmental degradation conditions 37,42,44 , that is why it is subject of many controversies data 22,37,42,44 . A clear indications have been reported by Song et al 2015 42 which attributed the weak and broad absorption band to cellulose I, while the strong and sharp one might be assigned to cellulose II and amorphous cellulose.…”
Section: Ftir Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased accessibility for enzymes seems to be strongly related to the cellulose structure that is the arrangement of cellulose chains in the cell wall and the cellulose crystallinity. In fact, cellulose can be transformed from natural cellulose I to the thermodynamically more stable cellulose II (Kontturi 2006;Song et al 2015). In particular alkaline conditions eventually lead to the rearrangement of neighboring cellulose fibers with different orientation to form cellulose II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lignin fills the voids between carbohydrates in the plant cell wall, which creates highly natural biomass recalcitrance that reduces their accessibility to carbohydrate-modifying enzymes. Lignin content is the key factor that is negatively correlated with enzyme digestibility and sugar release (Song et al 2015;Yu et al 2015;Raut et al 2016). With less than 20% lignin content in Populus, the sugar yield increases significantly for enzymatic hydrolysis even without pretreatment (Studer et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%