2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation between blood pressure and kidney function decline in older people: a registry-based cohort study

Abstract: ObjectivesTo examine the relation between static and dynamic blood pressure (BP) measurements and the evolution of kidney function in older people, adjusted for the presence of multimorbidity.DesignRetrospective cohort study during a 10-year time interval (2002–2012) in three age strata of patients aged 60 and older.SettingPrimary care registration network with 97 general practitioners working in 55 practices regularly submitting collected patient data.ParticipantsAll patients with at least one BP measurement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate of renal function decline was estimated by fitting a linear regression line through the eGFR measurements for each individual patient and expressed as eGFR slope (mL/min per 1.73 m 2 per year). This method has been used in other studies as well because eGFR at a point of time may not truly be reflective of change in kidney function due to its variability . eGFR was categorized according to the KDIGO 2012 guideline (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rate of renal function decline was estimated by fitting a linear regression line through the eGFR measurements for each individual patient and expressed as eGFR slope (mL/min per 1.73 m 2 per year). This method has been used in other studies as well because eGFR at a point of time may not truly be reflective of change in kidney function due to its variability . eGFR was categorized according to the KDIGO 2012 guideline (Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been used in other studies as well because eGFR at a point of time may not truly be reflective of change in kidney function due to its variability. [13][14][15][16] eGFR was categorized according to the KDIGO 2012 guideline (Table S1). Onset of CKD is defined as eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Measurement Of Renal Function Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como consecuencia de la técnica del muestreo accidental (muestreo no probabilístico), no se logró controlar todas las variables, lo que generó diferencias en las condiciones basales entre ambos grupos, por ejemplo, el grupo del adulto mayor estuvo cargado con pacientes hipertensos lo que pudo devenir en una variable de confusión, esta diferencia estaría traduciendo la mayor prevalencia de hipertensión arterial en el adulto mayor, llegando en algunas series a bordear el 80% [19] , mientras que en la población general la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial en Perú, estaría alrededor del 24% [20] , entonces, es posible que el muestreo accidental este reflejando dicha diferencia. En todo caso, esta situación que pudo haber favorecido una mayor frecuencia y/o gravedad de las alteraciones del medio interno [21,22] , no tendría sustento de acuerdo con los resultados de nuestro estudio.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The Flemish Intego network (for details see Truyers et al [ 21 ], Truyers et al [ 22 ], and Vaes et al [ 23 ]) is “the only operational computerized morbidity registration network in Belgium based on general practice data” [ 21 , p. 1]. Over 90 Intego GPs (see Table 1 ), who are good coders, collect data on about 2% “of the Flemish population representative in terms of age and sex” [ 21 , p. 1].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 90 Intego GPs (see Table 1 ), who are good coders, collect data on about 2% “of the Flemish population representative in terms of age and sex” [ 21 , p. 1]. “Intego procedures were approved by the ethical review board of the Medical School of the Catholic University of Leuven (N° ML 1723) and by the Belgian Privacy Commission (number SCSZG/13/079)” [ 23 , p. 10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%