2016
DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-1752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The COPD Assessment Test: What Do We Know So Far?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinical practice, CAT is able to distinguish among patients with exacerbation of COPD [37], patients with different degrees of severity [37], and patients with associated comorbidities [37]. Moreover, CAT has demonstrated its validity as a prognostic measure [38,39]. In the present study, we found a close relationship between SAD and CAT (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In clinical practice, CAT is able to distinguish among patients with exacerbation of COPD [37], patients with different degrees of severity [37], and patients with associated comorbidities [37]. Moreover, CAT has demonstrated its validity as a prognostic measure [38,39]. In the present study, we found a close relationship between SAD and CAT (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A mean CAT score of 15.8 in these patients, who are characterised with stable disease and a maximum of one acute exacerbation in the past 12 months, raises questions as to the clinical usefulness of the current threshold of 10 points, discriminating patients with low symptom load, as opposed to those with high symptom load. In fact, a recent meta-analysis of studies using the CAT did not support the recommended cut-off of 10 points for the purpose of assessing patient symptoms [20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a disease‐special questionnaire designed to provide a simple measure of symptomatology and health status of COPD patients, validated in China . The scale consists of eight items and each question is graded from 0 to 5, giving a total score range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact of the disease .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%