2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9666-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of executive functions to naming digits, objects, and words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it may relate to the fact that we controlled for the effects of the nonexecutive processing demands of the inhibition tasks before testing the role of inhibition in reading comprehension. As shown by Altani et al (in press), executive and nonexecutive demands of inhibition and shifting are strongly interrelated. If the effects of the nonexecutive demands of inhibition tasks are not controlled for, it is possible that speed or naming requirements alone (not inhibition) drive the relationship between inhibition and reading comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it may relate to the fact that we controlled for the effects of the nonexecutive processing demands of the inhibition tasks before testing the role of inhibition in reading comprehension. As shown by Altani et al (in press), executive and nonexecutive demands of inhibition and shifting are strongly interrelated. If the effects of the nonexecutive demands of inhibition tasks are not controlled for, it is possible that speed or naming requirements alone (not inhibition) drive the relationship between inhibition and reading comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To our knowledge, only Kieffer et al () have examined the indirect effects of EF components on reading comprehension through reading accuracy and vocabulary and have found that shifting, but not inhibition or working memory, had a small indirect effect on reading comprehension through vocabulary. An indirect relationship between EF and reading comprehension would be expected on the basis of evidence showing that performance on EF tasks is associated with both word reading (e.g., Altani, Protopapas, & Georgiou, in press; Arrington, Kulesz, Francis, Fletcher, & Barnes, ; Best, Miller, & Naglieri, ; Lan et al, ; Monette et al, ; Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, ) and oral language skills (e.g., Lonigan, Lerner, Goodrich, Farrington, & Allan, ; McClelland et al, ; Potocki et al, in press). Arrington et al (), for example, reported direct effects of inhibition and working memory on reading fluency in a sample of adolescent students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, correlations with RAN, controlling for discrete naming, can be used as indices of serial processing. Alternative explanations of the serial superiority effect invoking effects of executive function or visual scanning direction have failed to account for the observed associations (Altani, Protopapas, & Georgiou, 2017;Protopapas, Altani, & Georgiou, 2013b; but cf. Kuperman, van Dyke, & Henry, 2016).…”
Section: Differential Associations With Serial and Discrete Namingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this evidence, researchers have claimed that serial naming involves processes specific to the sequential nature of the task (e.g., rapid eye movement control and efficient scheduling of multiple items) which drive its relationship with reading (e.g., Georgiou et al, 2013 ; Gordon and Hoedemaker, 2016 ; Kuperman et al, 2016 ), beyond the automaticity of name retrieval (e.g., Stanovich et al, 1983 ; Logan et al, 2011 ). Recent studies examining this serial superiority effect in the relationship between naming and reading have shown that the way items are presented and processed in both word reading and digit naming can influence the size of their relationship (e.g., de Jong, 2011 ; Protopapas et al, 2013 ; Altani et al, 2017b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%