Abstract-Previous research into willingness to communicate in a second language (L2WTC) has focused primarily on its psychological aspects, and its socio-cultural nature is under explored. Framed with a sociocultural perspective on second language learning, this study examined the relationship between L2 willingness to communicate, social/cultural capital and its five underlying factors including cultural competence, social competence, social solidarity, literacy, and extraversion in the Iranian EFL context. To this end, the Social and Cultural Capital Questionnaire (SCCQ) by Pishghadam, Noghani, and Zabihi (2011) and WTC questionnaire by MacIntyre, Baker, Clé ment, and Conrad (2001) were administered to a sample of 312 English-major students from three universities in Iran. The Pearson product-moment correlation showed the existence of highly significant correlations between all five factors of SCCQ and learners' L2WTC. Moreover, results from the regression analysis revealed that cultural competence and literacy were the best predictors of WTC. The implications of the study are discussed.Index Terms-willingness to communicate, social capital, cultural capital, Iranian EFL learners
I. INTRODUCTIONThe construct of willingness to communicate was originally conceptualized by McCroskey and Baer (1985) as an individual difference in first language (L1) and was defined as the probability to engage in communication when given the choice (McCroskey & Richmond, 1990). In recent decades, the construct has received a great deal of attention in the field of second language (L2) education. The reason for such interest may be the important role accorded to interaction and communication in L2 acquisition within modern language pedagogy (Kang, 2005). Indeed, as stated by Dö rnyei (2005), the goal of language learning is to improve the learners' communicative competence in the target language.The construct of willingness to communicate in second language (L2WTC) was conceptualized by MacIntyre, Clé ment, Dö rnyei, and Noels (1998). They defined WTC as "a readiness to enter into discourse, at a particular time with a specific person or persons, using L2" (p. 547). According to this model, WTC could be affected by various social, linguistic, and communicative variables. The review of related literature shows that many studies have explored L2 WTC in relation to various individual differences (ID); these studies have focused on variables such as motivation (Hashimoto, 2002;MacIntyre et al., 2001;MacIntyre & Charos, 1996), personality (MacIntyre & Carre, 2000), selfconfidence (Ghonsooly, Khajavy, & Asadpour, 2012), shyness, and anxiety (Baker & MacIntyre, 2000, 2003Yashima, 2002), attitude (Yashima, 2002;Yashima et al., 2004). Yet, despite the rich findings from previous research, little effort has been devoted to studying L2 WTC in association with socio-cultural aspects of language learning in EFL contexts. In countries where English is learned as a foreign language (EFL), learners' socio-cultural background significantly affects ...