2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The constant score in normal shoulders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
126
1
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
12
126
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the Constant Score 19,20,21,22 and Oxford Score 24,31 have been validated for the assessment of shoulder conditions. Both of these scoring systems have shown significant benefits of physiotherapy intervention in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the Constant Score 19,20,21,22 and Oxford Score 24,31 have been validated for the assessment of shoulder conditions. Both of these scoring systems have shown significant benefits of physiotherapy intervention in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measure was the Constant-Murley Score 19 , which reflects shoulder function with accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility 20,21,22 . The score combines subjective and objective measures to produce a 100 point score, comprising four parameters: activities of daily living, range of motion, pain and strength.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Isobex dynamometer is portable and easy to use. It is the most commonly reported strength measurement device for the shoulder, and its accuracy and reliability have been validated by other investigators 2,4,27,28 . This study has a few limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In previous studies [1][2][3][4] , in which normative databases of shoulder strength were constructed, isometric shoulder strength was measured in individuals who were asymptomatic on the basis of a medical record review and/or interview. No imaging modalities were used to exclude asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoring system is based on subjective (sleep, work, recreational activities) and objective (range of motion and strength) components, adjusted for age and gender, according to normative data reported by Yian et al 37 The summary score ranges from 0 (worst result) to 100 (best result). Another secondary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment.…”
Section: Outcomes and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%