2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-008-9068-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequences of Battleground and “Spectator” State Residency for Political Participation

Abstract: This study uses pooled NES and state-level turnout data from 1988 through 2004 to assess whether a participation gap is emerging in the United States between the residents of battleground and non-battleground states in presidential elections. The analysis finds that Electoral College (EC) participatory disparities are more likely to occur in voting and meeting attendance than in donating and political discussion. Moreover, it suggests that such disparities are more likely to occur when presidential elections a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is likely that solid red or blue states where either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party receives an overwhelming majority of support are systematically excluded from the benefits of the election campaigns, as was the case with those examined in this study. Therefore, if the current electoral geography in U.S. politics remains little changed, the unequal democratic citizenship between the so‐called safe and battleground media markets may be cultivated and ultimately solidified by regularly recurring election campaigns (Lipsitz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is likely that solid red or blue states where either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party receives an overwhelming majority of support are systematically excluded from the benefits of the election campaigns, as was the case with those examined in this study. Therefore, if the current electoral geography in U.S. politics remains little changed, the unequal democratic citizenship between the so‐called safe and battleground media markets may be cultivated and ultimately solidified by regularly recurring election campaigns (Lipsitz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phipps et al (2010) , based on Aaker's (1991) model of Brand Equity Ten, explored that the communities voting behavior is highly influenced by the brand equity of candidates and political parties. Similarly, the decline in voters loyalty and political involvement in American political setting has been studied by (Putnam, 2000;Mair and van Biezen 2001;Panagopoulos and Wielhouwer, 2008;Huang and Shaw 2009;Lipsitz, 2009). Parker (2012) defined the political brand equity concept as the intangible asset that political consumers associate with the candidate name.…”
Section: Voting Behavior and Political Brandmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A national recount would mean that the extended delays already experienced in the one state would be replicated everywhere, making it doubtful that Americans would have a president clearly accepted in time for the inauguration. (Lipsiz, 2009) Regardless of the advantages of the 'Direct popular election' there is a significant drawback which is a major cautionary reason for this potential proposed to be the applied as the amended or altered solution to the Electoral College. This potential resolution would put the sole power to elect the president in hands of the few in the larger states.…”
Section: Direct Popular Election/ Automatic Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%