2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-017-1006-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coming of age of conservation genetics in Latin America: what has been achieved and what needs to be done

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study underscores that historical natural features that preclude individual dispersal may be more critical than recent events of anthropogenic habitat modification (e.g., González‐Serna, Cordero, & Ortego, 2018). A general understanding of factors leading to diversification of stream‐breeding frogs will only become feasible when we have more comparative landscape genetic studies in tropical habitats (Torres‐Florez et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study underscores that historical natural features that preclude individual dispersal may be more critical than recent events of anthropogenic habitat modification (e.g., González‐Serna, Cordero, & Ortego, 2018). A general understanding of factors leading to diversification of stream‐breeding frogs will only become feasible when we have more comparative landscape genetic studies in tropical habitats (Torres‐Florez et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphibians are one of the most endangered vertebrate groups (Wake & Vredenburg, 2008) as evidenced by multiple species declines globally due to a combination of factors, including anthropogenic habitat modification (the Global Decline of Amphibians; Allentoft & O’Brien, 2010; Becker, Fonseca, Haddad, Batista, & Prado, 2007; Blaustein & Kiesecker, 2002; Cushman, 2006; Scheele et al., 2019). As a result, conservation genetic studies have focused mainly on vegetation loss and distribution of remaining suitable habitats, especially in the Neotropics (Dixo et al., 2009; Eterovick et al., 2016; Torres‐Florez et al., 2018). By adding topography to the scenario, we bring novel information for amphibian conservation, especially for the highly threatened Brazilian Cerrado at both local and broad scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a gap between population genetic research and conservation practices remains, genetic data has been successfully used to address assessment, management and conservation needs in many marine species for at least three decades in developed countries (Milner et al, 1985;Shaklee et al, 1999;Vera et al, 2016). However, implementing such strategies remains challenging in Chile. In recent decades, genetic diversity and population structure have been assessed using microsatellites, one of the most widely used markers for conservation genetics, molecular ecology and population genetics studies in non-model species (Pérez-Espona and ConGRESS Consortium, 2017;Torres-Florez et al, 2017). Microsatellites are codominant, highly polymorphic and ostensibly neutral markers in natural populations, with mutation rates of 10 −3 -10 −4 per generation (Ellegren, 2004;Lenstra et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all respondents had considered using genetics for conservation management, and 80% had performed a genetic assessment in their managed area, either directly or through collaboration (Figure 1d), although a limitation to the survey could be that respondents may be biasedtoward individuals who were already more interested in using geneticdata to inform conservation. However, given the consistency of results, it appears that a positive perception of genetics for conservation management may not have a geographic bias, although applications and barriers may differ among countries and regions for reasons such as funding and legislation (e.g., Torres‐Florez et al (2018)).…”
Section: Use and Perceptions Of Genetic Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%