2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical and biological impact of new pathogen inactivation technologies on platelet concentrates

Abstract: Since 1990, several techniques have been developed to photochemically inactivate pathogens in platelet concentrates, potentially leading to safer transfusion therapy. The three most common methods are amotosalen/UVA (INTERCEPT Blood System), riboflavin/UVA-UVB (MIRASOL PRT), and UVC (Theraflex-UV). We review the biology of pathogen inactivation methods, present their efficacy in reducing pathogens, discuss their impact on the functional aspects of treated platelets, and review clinical studies showing the clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our regional blood transfusion services usually have a mix of both types of PC in order to optimize the use of whole blood donations, to mitigate the risk of shortages, and to ensure adequate availability of HLA-typed AP-PC. Since the introduction of mandatory universal pathogen inactivation of all PC in 2011 [2], AP-PC and BC-PC are considered clinically equivalent. However, some differences exist between both types of PC, such as the extent of residual contaminating red blood cells (RBC), which has been shown to be considerably lower for AP-PC (0.00017-0.009 ml) compared to BC-PC (0.036-0.59 ml) [3,4,5,6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our regional blood transfusion services usually have a mix of both types of PC in order to optimize the use of whole blood donations, to mitigate the risk of shortages, and to ensure adequate availability of HLA-typed AP-PC. Since the introduction of mandatory universal pathogen inactivation of all PC in 2011 [2], AP-PC and BC-PC are considered clinically equivalent. However, some differences exist between both types of PC, such as the extent of residual contaminating red blood cells (RBC), which has been shown to be considerably lower for AP-PC (0.00017-0.009 ml) compared to BC-PC (0.036-0.59 ml) [3,4,5,6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is a risk of bacterial growth during RT storage, as well as the danger of other emerging (undetected) pathogens, several countries now use pathogen inactivation technologies (PITs) to ensure a safer product [5]. Indeed, since the introduction of PITs adverse transfusion reactions and transfusion-transmitted infections have decreased dramatically [6]. Currently, there are two main commercially available PITs: INTERCEPT™ (Cerus, Concord, MA, USA) and Mirasol ® (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published hemovigilance data predominantly concern the A-L (Intercept) method with all reports confirming both the safety and efficacy of A-L-treated platelets in a huge number of platelet transfusions. 312 If on the one hand, PR technologies are designed to irreversibly disrupt nucleic acids of pathogens, on the other, they also cause collateral reactive oxidation-related damage to platelet proteins, thus enhancing the platelet storage lesion. Comparison of such damage by different PR techniques has been shown by a consortium represented by four (Switzerland, Italy, France, Germany) European research groups, along with a Canadian group.…”
Section: European Research Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%