2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00041-005-4079-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clifford-Fourier Transform

Abstract: A pair of Clifford-Fourier transforms is defined in the framework of Clifford analysis, as operator exponentials with a Clifford algebra-valued kernel. It is a genuine Clifford analysis construct, which is shown to be a refinement of the classical multi-dimensional Fourier transform.An adequate operational calculus is developed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is quite different for the Clifford-Fourier transform (CFT), where by now an almost complete treatment has been obtained. This transform was first introduced in [18] and further studied in [19,20]. It was initially also defined using a generalization of F3, namely…”
Section: Overview Of Recent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is quite different for the Clifford-Fourier transform (CFT), where by now an almost complete treatment has been obtained. This transform was first introduced in [18] and further studied in [19,20]. It was initially also defined using a generalization of F3, namely…”
Section: Overview Of Recent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes apparent, also from the given examples, that the Clifford analysis framework is most appropriate to develop these multidimensional Hilbert transforms. That Clifford analysis could be a powerful tool in multidimensional signal analysis became already clear during the last decade from the several constructions of multidimensional Fourier transforms with quaternionic or Clifford algebra valued kernels with direct applications in signal analysis and pattern recognition, see [20,21,24,[32][33][34]39] and also the review paper [23] wherein the relations between the different approaches are established. In view of the fact that in the underly-ing paper the interaction of the Clifford-Hilbert transforms with only the standard Fourier transform was considered, their interplay with the various Clifford-Fourier transforms remains an intriguing and promising topic for further research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As each function in the Hardy space H 2 (R m+1 ± ), (20), possesses a non-tangential L 2 boundary limit for x 0 → 0±, one is lead to the introduction of the Hardy space…”
Section: Definition and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since moreover it holds that tθ ± = −iθ ± |t, it can be readily verified that the functions f ( x, t + x 0 |t|) θ ± are monogenic. This is the way in which monogenic Fourier kernels were constructed by T. Qian and A. Mc Intosh ([Li et al, 1994]), see also [Sommen, 1988] and [Brackx et al, 2005].…”
Section: The Cauchy-kovalevskaya Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%