The classification of occupations by means of Kuder Interest profiles: I. The development of interest groups.

Holland, John L.; Krause, Allen H.; Nixon, Marion; Trembath, Mary F.

doi:10.1037/h0057095

Cited by 18 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A coding system is proposed here which meets Frandsen's (8) objections to Wiener's (20) system. It is similar to the system reported by Hathaway (10) and Holland et al (11).…”

supporting

confidence: 91%

Coding the Kuder Preference Record—Vocational.

Callis

Engram²,

McGowan³

1954

Journal of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A coding system is proposed here which meets Frandsen's (8) objections to Wiener's (20) system. It is similar to the system reported by Hathaway (10) and Holland et al (11).…”

supporting

confidence: 91%

Coding the Kuder Preference Record—Vocational.

Callis

Engram²,

McGowan³

1954

Journal of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…With regard to the scientist-humanist differentiation in general (that is, as may be found in any area of study), research demonstrates that this differentiation represents two differing vocational interest patterns. Individuals interested in service work (toward individuals or society-the humanists) demonstrate significantly different (and in some instances, mutually exclusive) vocational interests than do those more interested in technical, scientific pursuits (Greaser, 1976;Farnsworth, 1969;Goodman, 1942;Holland, 1973;Holland, Krause, Nixon & Trembath, 1953;Kuder, 1951;MacPhail & Thompson, 1952;Nafziger & HelmSj 1974;Roe, 1953;Rounds & Dawis, 1979;Segal, 1961;Terman, 1954;Tyler, 1964). Those interested in the humanistic approach to life share vocational interests with, for example, ministers, teachers, artists, writers, and musicians, whereas those interested in science tend to share vocational interests with those interested in the formal study of things, such as laboratory technicians, laboratory scientists, and those interested in math and/or accounting.…”

Section: Vocational Interestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Boulder Model: History, rationale, and critique.

Frank¹

1984

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

133

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the current philosophy of education in clinical psychology allows for the existence oj a program of training clinical psychologists who primarily want to be practitioners in conjunction with the more traditional scientist-practitioner (Boulder Model) program, departments of psychology have been reticent to adopt two-track programs. Indeed, the controversy as to the heuristic value of the scientist-practitioner program versus the practitioner program continues. The criticism of the Boulder Model is that the rationale for requiring clinical psychology students to learn to do research as well as train to be clinicians was spurious; the Boulder Model trains students as researchers, a role that is incompatible with their interests and abilities. The history of the development of the Boulder Model was reviewed as were the data regarding the personality traits, interests, and abilities of people interested in research versus service work. These data indicate that the objections of the critics are well-founded.Most of us would agree that the scientist-practitioner model has not only served us well but has been enormously successful. (Strickland, 1983, p. 25) This assessment was made by the current president of the Division of Clinical Psychology. Strickland is not alone in her praise of the Boulder Model. Indeed, ever since the Boulder Conference (Raimy, 1950), when psychology gave public support for the scientist-practitioner model of training in clinical psychology, there have been many others who have expressed a similar positive sentiment-for example, the par-

show abstract

“…A useful index of modal patterning can be obtained from the Strong literature. A sample of modal Kuder patterns has been classified by Holland, et al (1953) and appears to be more amenable to research than are the Strong patterns. The latter study in which Bamette's data (1951) were re-examined by the use of modal Kuder patterns suggests that veterans with modal patterns for a particular occupational class are more apt to be judged "sue-cessful" than are veterans with more atypical patterns.…”

Section: The Role Of the Developmental Hierarchymentioning

confidence: 99%