The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals

Abstract

Aiming to investigate the citation advantage of author-pays model, the present communication compares open access (OA) and Toll Access (TA) papers recognition in author-pays OA journals in 2007-2011. This is the first large scale study concentrating on all APC-funded OA journals published by Springer and Elsevier as the two greatest publishers authorizing and embracing the model. According to the research findings, the OA papers have been exponentially increased in recent years. They are, also, found to outperform the TA ones in their impacts whether in the annual comparisons or across disciplines. The annual OA citation advantages range from 21.36 % for 2009 to 49.71 % for 2008. Social Sciences and Humanities (with 3.14 %) and Natural Sciences (with 35.95 %) gain the lowest and the highest advantages, respectively. The citation advantage can be attributed to the higher visibility of the OA articles, implying the popularity and usefulness of the OA author-pays model to their readership. It may, also, have roots in the selectivity of the authors in choosing the author-pays outlet to publish their high-quality papers, signifying the overall prestige of the OA papers published in the model. Whatever may be the ultimate interpretation, i.e. correlation or causation, the OA citation advantage may encourage the authors who are willing to support OA movement, while seeking to get published in the well-established traditional journals. This may help approach the not-yetachieved critical mass necessary to evaluate the success of the model.

The impact of open access on the medical literature: a review of current literature

“…The articles from high impact factor journals were also chosen in two studies of Norris (30) which researched the OACA in the study of 4,633 articles in the journals of 4 disciplines (ecology, mathematics, sociology and economics). Sotudeh (64) …”

“…Six studies pointed out the OACA (19,30,(63)(64)(65)(66)(67) they evidenced the differences between OACA between the subject fields. Antelman (63) found an increase in citations of OA articles by 45 % in philosophy, 51 % in electrical engineering, 86 % in political science and by 91 % in mathematics.…”

The World’s Approach toward Publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded Open Access Journals

“…The purposeful sample consisted of the papers published in the OA journals of Elsevier and Springer from 2007 to 2011, identified by, 19 analyzed at first, last, and corresponding author levels separately.…”

Open Access Determinants and the Effect on Article Performance

“…[8] showed that two of the 11 journals see positive effects on the number of citations due to open access, although the citation advantage appears to weaken over time. [9] [10] stated that the open access advantage in social science humanities disappears when the number of citations of the single most-cited article is eliminated from the data set in [9], suggesting that careful examination of data is needed for analyzing the advantage of open access.…”