2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: Characterizing This Novel Flap Configuration with Angiography and a Cadaveric Model

Abstract: Objective A chimerically configured gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is highly prevalent based on recent computed tomography (CT)-imaging data. The purpose of this study is to further characterize the vascular anatomy of this novel flap configuration and determine the feasibility of flap dissection. Materials and Methods To characterize flap arterial anatomy, lower extremity CT angiograms performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. To characterize venous anatomy and d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both radiographic and cadaveric anatomic studies have displayed the presence of clinically viable profunda perforators distally in the posterior-medial thigh. 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 Based on these findings—as well as our previously reported clinical experience—we believe the vPAP presents an excellent flap configuration to consider in appropriate patients. 3 13 24 Our data suggests that although the dominant perforator exits within 8 cm most of the time, over 25% of the time in our imaging studies and up to 50% of the time in our cadaver dissections the dominant perforator can be missed in the traditional tPAP design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both radiographic and cadaveric anatomic studies have displayed the presence of clinically viable profunda perforators distally in the posterior-medial thigh. 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 Based on these findings—as well as our previously reported clinical experience—we believe the vPAP presents an excellent flap configuration to consider in appropriate patients. 3 13 24 Our data suggests that although the dominant perforator exits within 8 cm most of the time, over 25% of the time in our imaging studies and up to 50% of the time in our cadaver dissections the dominant perforator can be missed in the traditional tPAP design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…22,25,26 These findings lend further anatomic support for the clinical application of the vPAP flap in autologous breast reconstruction, as well as for the use of preoperative imaging for surgical planning. 1,8,15,[17][18][19] Fig. 9 Here is an example of a patient with left breast cancer, who was treated with mastectomy and bilateral stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator-vertical profunda artery perforator (vPAP) flap reconstruction: (A, C) Preoperative and (B, D) postoperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations