2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2004.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chemical reaction equilibrium constant and standard molar enthalpy change for the reaction : a spectroscopic and calorimetric investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 958-cm −1 feature in Figure 1 agrees with the position of the most intense band of pyrosulfite (S 2 O 5 2− , also called metabisulfite and disulfite in the literature). This anion also has a weaker, broader band near 1152 cm −1 , which we also observed [see Ermatchkov et al, 2005]. We note that our 958-cm −1 feature is not due to SO 3 2− , which we observed at 927 cm −1 on warming ices made of H 2 O + SO 2 + NH 3 [Hisatsune and Heicklen, 1975].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 958-cm −1 feature in Figure 1 agrees with the position of the most intense band of pyrosulfite (S 2 O 5 2− , also called metabisulfite and disulfite in the literature). This anion also has a weaker, broader band near 1152 cm −1 , which we also observed [see Ermatchkov et al, 2005]. We note that our 958-cm −1 feature is not due to SO 3 2− , which we observed at 927 cm −1 on warming ices made of H 2 O + SO 2 + NH 3 [Hisatsune and Heicklen, 1975].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A similar band has been assigned to the SH stretch in HSO 3 − by others [ Connick et al , 1982; Hisatsune and Heicklen , 1975]. The two features in the 1100 – 1000 cm −1 region of Figure 1 resemble the bisulfite bands shown in papers of Ermatchkov et al [2005, Figure 1], and Zhang and Ewing [2002, Figure 3], and Pichler et al [1997, Figure 1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The equilibrium constant at 26 and 60˚C (K 26 = 22.8 l/mol, K 60 =46.9 l/mol) was taken from the literature [9]. The equilibrium constant for the reaction studied was calculated by means of Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where T is the temperature in Kelvin, constants A, B, C, D were adjustable parameters available in Aspen databank [72] except for the reaction (8) obtained from Ermatchkov et al [73], and their units are: A is dimensionless, B has the dimensions of T, C is dimensionless, and D has the dimensions of T -1 . The reaction rates ( ) of the reaction ( ) are presented in Table 6 below and are determined by the power law defined as;…”
Section: Model Specification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%