2010
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2011.563928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changing constellation of power and resistance in the global debate over agrofuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Furtado et al 2011) point out that the prominence of the Brazilian industry in the international markets is not due to its natural resources, but rather a consolidated innovation system that began in 1930 and was boosted in the 1970s and 1980 because of the Proálcool Program (Banerjee, 2005;Zapata & Nieuwenhuis, 2009;Leopold, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Furtado et al 2011) point out that the prominence of the Brazilian industry in the international markets is not due to its natural resources, but rather a consolidated innovation system that began in 1930 and was boosted in the 1970s and 1980 because of the Proálcool Program (Banerjee, 2005;Zapata & Nieuwenhuis, 2009;Leopold, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the growing need to increase agricultural and industrial productivity, the companies need to develop and implement technologies to enhance the reutilization of waste, to reduce water, energy and material consumption, to reduce CO 2 emission and, at the same time, to preserve the biodiversity surrounding the facilities and cultivated areas, as well as to ensure safe, healthy working conditions (Pires, 2008;Cirani et al 2010;Santos et al 2010;Leopold, 2010;Chandel et al 2010;Gomiero et al 2010;Spetic et al 2012). Figure 3 shows the emerging issues related to the sugar-ethanol industry, highlighted in a research proposed by (Spetic et al 2012), which corroborate the remarks already mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question has not yet received sufficient attention in the literature. An exception is the account of Aaron Leopold (2010), who asks why biofuels continue to enjoy strong political support in spite of mounting criticism by civil society groups and scientific scepticism. From a neo-Gramscian perspective, the author argues that biofuel promotion is above all economically motivated, since biofuel discourses and politics have been co-opted by hegemonic agro-industrial players.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On New "Energy Frontiers"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular since the hike in food commodity prices in (Leopold 2010, critics have accused biofuels for taking away land that had been used for cultivating food crops in countries of the global South and for contributing to the rise in food prices, which threatens the food security of the poor (Oxfam 2008: 19-21). Yet, it is not only the social implications of biofuels that are disputed; several investigations have called into question their very environmental and economic rationales.…”
Section: Biofuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, however, controversies arose regarding biofuels' performance in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, their possible negative effects on the environment, their ambiguous impact on rural development and, above all, the related use of cropland to produce fuel instead of food [14][15][16][17][18]. Civil society organizations, in particular, were very active in stirring up public debate about biofuel investments [19,20]. One of the most radical stances on biofuels called for a moratorium on these investments until such time as appropriate policies, structures and mechanisms could be put in place to enable poorer populations to benefit directly from biofuel production, storage, processing and transport [21,22].…”
Section: Biofuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%