The Challenge of Integrating eHealth Into Health Care: Systematic Literature Review of the Donabedian Model of Structure, Process, and Outcome

Abstract

Background Health care organizations are increasingly working with eHealth. However, the integration of eHealth into regular health care is challenging. It requires organizations to change the way they work and their structure and care processes to be adapted to ensure that eHealth supports the attainment of the desired outcomes. Objective The aims of this study are to investigate whether there are identifiable indicators in the structure, process, and outcome categories that are related to the successful integration of eHealth in regular health care, as well as to investigate which indicators of structure and process are related to outcome indicators. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome (SPO) framework to identify indicators that are related to the integration of eHealth into health care organizations. Data extraction sheets were designed to provide an overview of the study characteristics, eHealth characteristics, and indicators. The extracted indicators were organized into themes and subthemes of the structure, process, and outcome categories. Results Eleven studies were included, covering a variety of study designs, diseases, and eHealth tools. All studies identified structure, process, and outcome indicators that were potentially related to the integration of eHealth. The number of indicators found in the structure, process, and outcome categories was 175, 84, and 88, respectively. The themes with the most-noted indicators and their mutual interaction were inner setting (51 indicators, 16 interactions), care receiver (40 indicators, 11 interactions), and technology (38 indicators, 12 interactions)—all within the structure category; health care actions (38 indicators, 15 interactions) within the process category; and efficiency (30 indicators, 15 interactions) within the outcome category. In-depth examination identified four most-reported indicators, namely “deployment of human resources” (n=11), in the inner setting theme within the structure category; “ease of use” (n=16) and “technical issue” (n=10), both in the technology theme within the structure category; and “health logistics” (n=26), in the efficiency theme within the outcome category. Conclusions Three principles are important for the successful integration of eHealth into health care. First, the role of the care receiver needs to be incorporated into the organizational structure and daily care process. Second, the technology must be well attuned to the organizational structure and daily care process. Third, the deployment of human resources to the daily care processes needs to be aligned with the desired end results. Not adhering to these points could negatively affect the organization, daily process, or the end results.

A Digital Health Service for Elderly People with Balance Disorders and Risk of Falling: A Design Science Approach

“…However, according to the literature [37][38][39][40][41], some remaining constraints for the clinical applicability of digital devices have been discussed: limitations of elderly people in accessing and using technologies, need for previous digital training and caregiver support. In fact, the caregivers' deep involvement and training were essential in our study as was reported in previous research [33,34].…”

“…The patients and caregivers highlighted the medical involvement with quick response to their questions. In fact, the involvement of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals is one key point for the success of digital interactive solutions [33,34].…”

“…Using focus groups, we explored the potential contributions, constraints for clinical applicability, satisfaction and strategies to improve the digital solution. In fact, digital health end-user experience is important, listening and engaging with patient, family members, caregivers, health professionals and policymakers to improve the implementation of digital solutions in clinical contexts [3,34,35].…”

The impact of a digital platform on migraine patient‐centered outcome research. Evaluation of midolordecabeza.org, a headache website in Spanish

“…Nowadays, we are witnessing the digital transformation of medical care, with a rapid growth in eHealth, patient empowerment, and patient‐centered research 10 . Digitization is not only a tool for collecting clinical information but also a way of systematizing data collection and minimizing bias, to improve its analysis and dissemination for the benefit of patients 11 .…”

Impact of the Staffing Structure of Intensive Care Units and High Care Units on In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Analysis of Japanese Nationwide Claims Data

“…Optimal sepsis care is therefore dependent on the availability of an effective health care provision system with adequate resources. Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model is a well-established approach for assessing health care quality [5], and has been applied in the elds of critical care and emergency care [6][7][8][9][10]. The sta ng characteristics of intensive care units (ICUs) can be analyzed as part of the "structure" component of Donabedian's triad.…”