2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cedar Project: Residential transience and HIV vulnerability among young Aboriginal people who use drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have turned to substance use as a way to cope with the effects of these historical and lifetime traumas [ 40 - 42 ]. Intersections of substance use and poverty can create barriers to connectedness, for example, by contributing to incarceration and housing transitions [ 43 ]. Lack of phone ownership must be understood within the context of colonization, which continues to impact the well-being of Indigenous people across Canada and is a key consideration for future mHealth programs [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have turned to substance use as a way to cope with the effects of these historical and lifetime traumas [ 40 - 42 ]. Intersections of substance use and poverty can create barriers to connectedness, for example, by contributing to incarceration and housing transitions [ 43 ]. Lack of phone ownership must be understood within the context of colonization, which continues to impact the well-being of Indigenous people across Canada and is a key consideration for future mHealth programs [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A largely quantitative body of research from settings across North America has highlighted various barriers to accessing care among vulnerable youth, including long wait times, age restrictions, a lack of trained providers and access to pharmacotherapies, and experiences of discrimination on the basis of gender, race and sexuality [ 15 19 ]. For young people experiencing street entrenchment, barriers to services are often compounded for those experiencing the concurrent disorders of substance use and mental health issues [ 20 ], and residential instability and mobility across institutional (e.g., government care homes, correctional facilities) and non-institutional (e.g., ‘flop houses’) settings over time [ 21 , 22 ]. Moreover, among vulnerable youth, negative experiences with various forms of institutionalization and care stretching back to their childhoods can lead them to the conclusion that reducing or eliminating drug use are things best accomplished independently, without professional help [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, loss to follow-up may be higher in the comparison group than the intervention group. Cedar Project participants are highly transient and often difficult to track down [ 41 ]. Having a mobile phone and consistent airtime will likely make it easier to reach participants receiving the intervention for follow-up visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cedar Project participants represent many of the diverse First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities across Canada and are often living far away from their home communities. Participants are highly transient, moving frequently between cities and reserves, making continuity of care a tremendous challenge [ 41 ]. Indigenous interviewers and nurses support both sites and are encouraged to provide referrals to cultural supports, health care, substance use services, food programs, housing, and counseling for participants who seek them.…”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%