2020
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1795516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for Methodological Pluralism in Medical Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, since the data in this study are from controlled clinical trials, they do not accurately provide implications for clinical research in the real world. Recently, efforts have been made to derive clinical evidence using real world data (RWD), and it is expected that various problems such as securing subjects in clinical trials and lack of control groups, post-approval follow-up will be resolved [ 37 , 38 ]. For example, if more data related to clinical trials to use artificial intelligence (AI) such as machine learning can be used, a clinical trial execution strategy suitable for each organization's situation could be developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, since the data in this study are from controlled clinical trials, they do not accurately provide implications for clinical research in the real world. Recently, efforts have been made to derive clinical evidence using real world data (RWD), and it is expected that various problems such as securing subjects in clinical trials and lack of control groups, post-approval follow-up will be resolved [ 37 , 38 ]. For example, if more data related to clinical trials to use artificial intelligence (AI) such as machine learning can be used, a clinical trial execution strategy suitable for each organization's situation could be developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%