2021
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for a National SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Healthy food incentive programs, such as the USDA Healthy Incentives Program and the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), have been shown to increase fruit and vegetable expenditure and intake [11][12][13], reduce food insecurity [14], and improve healthy eating behaviors [15]. Although effective, these programs are underutilized, with only a small fraction of SNAP participants having access to them [15]. Additionally, consumer demand often outpaces program budgets, and nonfederal financial matching requirements are a burden for state institutions, limiting the scope of incentives [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Healthy food incentive programs, such as the USDA Healthy Incentives Program and the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), have been shown to increase fruit and vegetable expenditure and intake [11][12][13], reduce food insecurity [14], and improve healthy eating behaviors [15]. Although effective, these programs are underutilized, with only a small fraction of SNAP participants having access to them [15]. Additionally, consumer demand often outpaces program budgets, and nonfederal financial matching requirements are a burden for state institutions, limiting the scope of incentives [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although effective, these programs are underutilized, with only a small fraction of SNAP participants having access to them [15]. Additionally, consumer demand often outpaces program budgets, and nonfederal financial matching requirements are a burden for state institutions, limiting the scope of incentives [15]. Programs such as the Brighter Bites produce voucher program create innovative partnerships between a non-profit and large grocery retail stores, using both electronic and physical vouchers, administered to low-income families, and allow for the purchase of a variety of produce of their choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent AJPH commentary called for an expansion of NI programs to include all SNAP participants in the U.S., while highlighting insufficient federal funding [33]. Yet, an impediment to expansion is the lack of clarity around which models have the greatest public health impact and at what cost.…”
Section: Making the Case For Shared Measures For Financial Incentive Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared measures would support elucidation of best practices, such as the most effective incentive dose or co-intervention (e.g., transportation support) for a variety of geographical settings and populations served. Standardized survey modules and other instruments help to eliminate "guesswork" and build capacity for practitioners that are less familiar with evaluation [30,33]. Shared and standardized evaluation measures allow for multiple stakeholders to understand how projects compare and can provide evidence for funders who are interested in capturing return on investment.…”
Section: Making the Case For Shared Measures For Financial Incentive Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%