volume 7, issue 4, P120-131 2011
DOI: 10.1177/174701611100700402
View full text
|
|
Share

Abstract: For decades, scholars in the social sciences and humanities have questioned the appropriateness and utility of prior review of their research by human subjects' ethics committees. This essay seeks to organize thematically some of their published complaints and to serve as a brief restatement of the major critiques of ethics review. In particular, it argues that 1) ethics committees impose silly restrictions, 2) ethics review is a solution in search of a problem, 3) ethics committees lack expertise, 4) ethics …

Expand abstract

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

0
0
0
0
0

Citation Types

0
104
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals