1927
DOI: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1927.02200360003001
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Brain of Prehistoric Man

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
10
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1929
1929
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This indicates that differences between the frontal lobes of apes and humans lie not in the total area that this lobe occupies relative to the rest of the brain, but instead to the underlying complexity of the lobe (Semendeferi et al, 1997). While others have attempted to derive features of particular gyri and sulci from the frontal lobe of H. erectus endocasts (Kappers, 1933;Kappers and Bouman, 1939;Tilney, 1927), assessment of precise cerebral surface features is limited (Holloway, 1978). The endocranial surface morphology of Sm 3 is reduced compared to other Indonesian fossils, but a few features are markedly pronounced.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In describing the endocast of Trinil 2 (H. erectus I), Tilney (1927) positioned H. erectus far above gorilla but below modern humans. With one of the more detailed endocast descriptions of that time, he considered the frontal lobe of H. erectus to be well developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With one of the more detailed endocast descriptions of that time, he considered the frontal lobe of H. erectus to be well developed. In addition, Tilney regarded the morphology of the inferior frontal lobe as evidence that H. erectus "had learned to speak-to communicate in verbal language" (Tilney, 1927). Tilney's enthusiasm for the mental capacity of H. erectus in Indonesia was not echoed by others of the time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations