1995
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Borders of the Self: Contamination Sensitivity and Potency of the Body Apertures and Other Body Parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, unlike dissonance theory, the SVPM predicts a mere contemplation effect: it is not necessary to commit a counter-normative act: it is sufficient for counter-normative thoughts to flicker briefly through consciousness before rejecting them. That pre-rejection interval, during which one's natural first reaction to propositions is to consent [16], can produce a subjective sense -however unjustified -that one has been contaminated [17,18]. Second, the SVPM predicts that the longer one contemplates taboo-breaching proposals, the more contaminated one should feel.…”
Section: Moral Cleansingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, unlike dissonance theory, the SVPM predicts a mere contemplation effect: it is not necessary to commit a counter-normative act: it is sufficient for counter-normative thoughts to flicker briefly through consciousness before rejecting them. That pre-rejection interval, during which one's natural first reaction to propositions is to consent [16], can produce a subjective sense -however unjustified -that one has been contaminated [17,18]. Second, the SVPM predicts that the longer one contemplates taboo-breaching proposals, the more contaminated one should feel.…”
Section: Moral Cleansingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, disgust is focused on the intersection between the body and the environment and concentrates on the skin and body apertures (Fessler & Haley, 2006;Rozin, Nemeroff, Horowitz, Gordon, & Voet, 1995). The strength of the disgust response increases as a function of proximity of the potential contaminant and the sense of inclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the disgust response increases as a function of proximity of the potential contaminant and the sense of inclusion. It has been found that, for women, the vagina is the body part with the highest contamination sensitivity, whereas the penis of an unfamiliar male has the highest contamination potency (Rozin et al, 1995). Given the central role of these organs in the context of sexual behavior, together with the fact that bodily products (e.g., saliva, sweat, semen) and smells are among the strongest disgust elicitors (Rozin & Fallon, 1987), it is not very difficult to envisage that feelings of disgust and disgustrelated appraisals may arise during sex, which, in turn, may inadvertently influence sexual behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other likely candidates are corpses and signs of organic decay (Haidt et al 1994). Bodily orifices and, via contamination, things that come in contact with them are also powerful elicitors (Rozin et al 1995). All of these elicitors are disgust universals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%