1992
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402640404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bimodal auditory–vibratory system of the thoracic ventral nerve cord in Locusta migratoria (Acrididae, Locustinae, Oedipodini)

Abstract: In locusts the auditory receptors of the tympanal organs and many of the vibratory receptors of all 6 legs converge at the level of the thoracic ventral nerve cord, forming a combined auditory-vibratory sensory system; it is represented by the VS-, S-, and V-neurons ascending to the supraesophageal ganglion. The connections between vibratory receptors of the different legs and the dendritic inputs of the bimodal ascending neurons are investigated in this report. As an example, the dendritic branches of the G- … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the inset shows additionally, a schematic drawing of the projection (re- vealed by circumferences of the projection areas) of seven different functional types of auditory receptor cell in Decticus verrucivorus at a position inside the neuropile, which is 30 pm to the side of the midline ofthe prothoracic ganglion. The projections of the receptor cells of the intermediate organ and cnsta acustica are arranged tonotopically in a counterclockwise manner, which strongly resembles the projection arrangement in the neuropiles of the aRT of locusts (Halex et al, 1988;Bickmeyer et al, 1992). In spite of the different location, development, and construction of the tympanal organ and the truncal vibratory (-auditory) receptors, the similarity in arrangement is obvious.…”
Section: Different Functional Types In the Artmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison, the inset shows additionally, a schematic drawing of the projection (re- vealed by circumferences of the projection areas) of seven different functional types of auditory receptor cell in Decticus verrucivorus at a position inside the neuropile, which is 30 pm to the side of the midline ofthe prothoracic ganglion. The projections of the receptor cells of the intermediate organ and cnsta acustica are arranged tonotopically in a counterclockwise manner, which strongly resembles the projection arrangement in the neuropiles of the aRT of locusts (Halex et al, 1988;Bickmeyer et al, 1992). In spite of the different location, development, and construction of the tympanal organ and the truncal vibratory (-auditory) receptors, the similarity in arrangement is obvious.…”
Section: Different Functional Types In the Artmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the auditory receptors of the forelegs in tettigoniids project only to the aRT of the ipsilateral hemiganglion. The receptor cells of the subgenual organ as well as of other vibroreceptors of the forelegs (e.g., campaniform sensillae, femural and tibia1 chordotonal organs) project, as shown for locusts, to lateral parts of the related hemiganglia (Miicke, 199 1;Bickmeyer et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the metathoracic ganglion, the high frequency afferents project posteriorly to the other three groups of lower frequency (Römer, 1985), each of which projects to a distinct but more anterior region. There appears to be a gradient of decreasing sensitivity to low frequencies both away from the midline and anteriorly (Halex et al, 1988;Bickmeyer et al, 1992). The higher-frequency afferents have a greater anterior projection into the prothoracic ganglion than most of the lower-frequency ones, many of which do not project beyond the mesothoracic ganglion, while others only reach to the metathoracic ganglion.…”
Section: Tonotopic Organization Of Primary Afferents In Acrididsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, only few studies on central processing of vibratory signals of Orthoptera exist that include both physiological and morphological identification of the neurons involved (Č okl et al 1985;Bickmeyer 1991;Bickmeyer et al 1992;Sickmann 1997;Nebeling 2000). Unfortunately, these data are only available from hearing species, which is the reason why no stringent arguments for the proposed homology of the auditory and (part of) the vibratory system are available to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%