2020
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acz080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Background Cognitive dysfunction is one of the most prevalent non-motor aspects of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The present review focuses on published studies investigating the effect of computer-based cognitive training (CT) on neuropsychological performance in PD. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed database and Google Scholar was carried out. Randomized controlled studies published before September 2019, investigating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the study limitations, there is preliminary evidence from reviews or quantitative metaanalyses, albeit with mixed findings based on limited data of varying quality 184 , that cognitive training 185,186 , physical exercise 187,188 and noninvasive brain stimulation 189 may all lead to at least shortterm benefit in some cogni tive abilities, with the strongest evidence for executive function abilities. In terms of cognitive training, one systematic review found that the use of multidomain, computerbased cognitive training at a frequency of 2-3 times per week over 3-12 weeks is associated with measurable improvements in executive functions, memory, processing speed and attention 190 . However, another systematic review and metaanalysis graded the evidence from published clinical trials on cognitive training as low and recommended further largescale studies in PD 186 .…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the study limitations, there is preliminary evidence from reviews or quantitative metaanalyses, albeit with mixed findings based on limited data of varying quality 184 , that cognitive training 185,186 , physical exercise 187,188 and noninvasive brain stimulation 189 may all lead to at least shortterm benefit in some cogni tive abilities, with the strongest evidence for executive function abilities. In terms of cognitive training, one systematic review found that the use of multidomain, computerbased cognitive training at a frequency of 2-3 times per week over 3-12 weeks is associated with measurable improvements in executive functions, memory, processing speed and attention 190 . However, another systematic review and metaanalysis graded the evidence from published clinical trials on cognitive training as low and recommended further largescale studies in PD 186 .…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive training (CT) are increasingly discussed to prevent or delay cognitive impairment and the progression to PD dementia. 3,4 As working memory (WM) has been ascribed the role of a processing resource for other cognitive abilities 5 and is a vulnerable function in healthy aging, 6 WM has already become a main target for CT in healthy older adults. In this population, recent meta-analyses [7][8][9] on WM training (WMT) reveal significant positive training effects in trained tasks and near-transfer (i.e., untrained WM) tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although existing studies are limited by substantial methodological issues, such as small sample sizes, scarcity of evaluation of long-term effects, difficulty in designing reliable RCT as well as mixed study findings, there are preliminary data on the effectiveness of cognitive training in PD [49][50][51]. As an example, data on the effectiveness of computerized, multi-domain cognitive training (with a frequency of 2-3 times/week for 3-12 weeks) showed statistically significant improvements in working memory, visual memory, attention, processing speed, executive function, and visuospatial skills, although there are limitations related to the study design, software used and nature of the control groups (active, treatment-as-usual) [52]. Moreover, the existing evidence for cognitive training has mainly been gathered for PwP at the mild-moderate stage or for subjects with specific cognitive profiles (e.g.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%