1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199609)11:9<819::aid-gps389>3.3.co;2-j
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
The Behavior Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave‐ad): Reliability and Analysis of Symptom Category Scores
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
30
10
5
4
Citation Types
0
55
1
6
Year Published
1996
2022
Publication Types
Select...
40
2
Relationship
5
37
Authors
Journals
Cited by 42 publications
(62 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
55
1
6
“…There have been discrepant reports of linear or curvilinear patterns of relationship between behavioral symptoms and the global deteriorating course of AD. These results do not support a curvilinear relation that BPSD in AD become most prominent at the moderate and moderately severe stage (GDS Stages 5 and 6) of the illness, and less frequent at the severe stage (GDS Stage 7) (Swearer et al, 1988;Reisberg et al, 1989;Baumgarten et al, 1990;Kofler et al, 1990;Rosen and Zubenko, 1991;Sclan et al, 1996). There exists a very important difference in the subjects in GDS Stage 7 between this study and a representative report supporting curvilinear relation by Sclan and colleagues (1996).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…There have been discrepant reports of linear or curvilinear patterns of relationship between behavioral symptoms and the global deteriorating course of AD. These results do not support a curvilinear relation that BPSD in AD become most prominent at the moderate and moderately severe stage (GDS Stages 5 and 6) of the illness, and less frequent at the severe stage (GDS Stage 7) (Swearer et al, 1988;Reisberg et al, 1989;Baumgarten et al, 1990;Kofler et al, 1990;Rosen and Zubenko, 1991;Sclan et al, 1996). There exists a very important difference in the subjects in GDS Stage 7 between this study and a representative report supporting curvilinear relation by Sclan and colleagues (1996).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Several factors related to rater, subject, sample size and sampling method can influence reporting of each BEHAVE-AD symptom. In previous studies, subjects were recruited from various sources such as chart review (Reisberg et al, 1987), outpatient clinic (Harwood et al, 1998), and research registry (Patterson et al, 1990;Sclan et al, 1996). Their average MMSE scores were higher than in this study (e.g., 16.7 vs 12.9) and their sample sizes were smaller (e.g., 55-151 subjects vs 562 subjects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Multiple studies verified the reliability and validity of the BEHAVE-AD. 16 –20 Cronbach α for internal consistency was .79 for the 67 participants of the current article. In addition, we have examined the inter-rater reliability using conjoint interviews for 23 participants and found full agreement for the delusion questions (ie, inter-rater agreement of 100% and κ value of 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Total score ranges from 0 to 75 with higher scores indicating greater behavioral disturbance. High rater consistency and interrater agreement has been reported for the total scale scores 46,63 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
