2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behavior of two parallel interface cracks in magneto–electro–elastic materials under an anti-plane shear stress loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presentations (32), (33) and (35), (36) were formulated for mechanical, electrical, and magnetic factors via a functions which are analytic in the whole plane except the crack region. With these representations the combined Dirichlet-Riemann boundary value problem (37), (38) and Hilbert problem (44) are formulated and solved in the form of relatively simple analytical formulas for any position of the point a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presentations (32), (33) and (35), (36) were formulated for mechanical, electrical, and magnetic factors via a functions which are analytic in the whole plane except the crack region. With these representations the combined Dirichlet-Riemann boundary value problem (37), (38) and Hilbert problem (44) are formulated and solved in the form of relatively simple analytical formulas for any position of the point a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting (53) into (36), (39) and taking into account that ⟨ 2 ( 1 , 0)⟩ = 0, ⟨ 1 ( 1 , 0)⟩ = 0 at ( , ) we obtain the following expression for the displacement jump:…”
Section: Formulation and Solution Of The Problems Of Liner Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the SIF at the tips of the cracks can be obtained as [37] Kabadbreak=limxagoodbreak+0.33em20.33emπ0.33emfalse(xgoodbreak−afalse)0.33emτyzfalse(2false)(x,0)goodbreak=40.33emπ0.33emβ40.33emn=1cn0.33em12a0.33emnormalΓfalse(2n1/2false)false(2n2false)!,$$\begin{equation} K_a=\lim _{x\rightarrow a+}\ \sqrt {2\ \pi \ (x-a)}\ \tau _{yz}^{(2)}(x,0) = -4\ \sqrt {\pi } \ \beta _4\ \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } c_n\ \frac{1}{\sqrt {2a}}\ \frac{\Gamma (2n-1/2)}{(2n-2)!} , \end{equation}$$ Kbbadbreak=limxbgoodbreak−0.33em20.33emπ0.33emfalse(bgoodbreak−xfalse)0.33emτyzfalse(3false)(x,h)goodbreak=40.33emπ0.33emβ10.33emn=10.33embn0.33em1cb0.33emnormalΓfalse(n+3/2false)n!,$$\begin{equation} K_b=\lim _{x\rightarrow b-}\ \sqrt {2\ \pi \ (b-x)}\ \tau _{yz}^{(3)}(x,h) =- 4\ \sqrt {\pi }\ \beta _1\ \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \ b_n\ \frac{1}{\sqrt {c-b}}\ \frac{\Gamma (n+3/2)}{n!}…”
Section: Sifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under similar loading conditions, three cracks under static thermo-mechanical loadings were studied by Tanwar et al [36]. In [37], the authors have investigated the behaviour of two symmetric parallel interfacial cracks under anti-plane shear stress loading. Das and Patra [38] have studied dynamic SIFs in moving Griffith cracks present in dissimilar orthotropic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetoelectroelastic fields for dissimilar semi-infinite magnetoelectroelastic bimaterial subjected to a general concentrated magnetoelectroelastic load were obtained analytically in Wan et al [6]. Zhou et al [7] presented the field intensity factors for the parallel interface cracks in magnetoelectroelastic multi-materials under an anti-plane shear load and Hu et al [8] investigated more complex dynamic problems involving the interface crack between magnetoelectroelastic and functionally graded elastic layers. 2D stress singularities in multi-magnetoelectroelastic material wedges were studied in Liu and Chue [9] and 3D stress singularities in the fracture magnetoelectroelastic body were reported in Huang and Hu [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%