1996
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The basic concepts of failure analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is that the remaining structural elements may be able to sustain the external loading by the redistribution of load effects [8]. For the elastic-plastic behaviors of RC structure, the complexity of failure and functional diversity indicate that failure criterion may have different cases.…”
Section: Structural Seismic Failure Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that the remaining structural elements may be able to sustain the external loading by the redistribution of load effects [8]. For the elastic-plastic behaviors of RC structure, the complexity of failure and functional diversity indicate that failure criterion may have different cases.…”
Section: Structural Seismic Failure Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of all of failure analysis's routine tasks can be diminished by the inability to appreciate the impact of a single mechanism affecting reliability. Failure mechanisms quickly understood can prevent multimillion dollar catastrophe [1] In order to carry out effective Failure Analysis on semiconductor devices, it is essential to have a disciplined analytical schedule to ensure that no relevant information is lost by virtue of any haphazard approach [2,3] Since 1995 [4,5,6] the Authors have tried to perform the Failure Analysis of some Failure Analyses, showing the reasons of so many result unsatisfying, in order to demonstrate that a properly well done Failure Analysis is able to supply useful answers [7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A risk (5%) between the two laws is shown as shown in Table 5. The D 11 value (0.05) = 0.391 is taken from the digital table "Kolmogorov Smirnov" [1,2,5] The calculation of the MTBF is as follows:…”
Section: Application Of Correlation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%