2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-s9-s10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies

Abstract: Background: Reproducibility is a fundamental requirement in scientific experiments. Some recent publications have claimed that microarrays are unreliable because lists of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are not reproducible in similar experiments. Meanwhile, new statistical methods for identifying DEGs continue to appear in the scientific literature. The resultant variety of existing and emerging methods exacerbates confusion and continuing debate in the microarray community on the appropriate choice of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
162
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(59 reference statements)
7
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomics approaches continue to be criticized because of inconsistent results (Miklos and Maleszka 2004;Draghici et al 2006), and while some of this inconsistency arises from data processing (Shi et al 2008), differences in sample RNA integrity markedly affect transcript quantification and likely are the cause of much of the inconsistency (Auer et al 2003;Lipska et al 2006;Atz et al 2007;Thompson et al 2007;Popova et al 2008). Sample RNA of the highest quality is therefore imperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomics approaches continue to be criticized because of inconsistent results (Miklos and Maleszka 2004;Draghici et al 2006), and while some of this inconsistency arises from data processing (Shi et al 2008), differences in sample RNA integrity markedly affect transcript quantification and likely are the cause of much of the inconsistency (Auer et al 2003;Lipska et al 2006;Atz et al 2007;Thompson et al 2007;Popova et al 2008). Sample RNA of the highest quality is therefore imperative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student's t test was performed in group-wise comparison of gene expression. A P value < 0.05 combined with a greater than twofold change were considered significant in accordance with the recommendations of the MicroArray Quality Control project group, which were shown to achieve a balance of sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility (38,39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because microarrays can be very reliable for identifying differentially expressed genes when fold changes are generally large (Shi et al, 2008), as in this study, we did not consider it essential to evaluate changes in gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR using the same samples. In future studies, it will certainly be of interest to examine the expression of key genes identified in this study under a variety of different conditions.…”
Section: Many Genes Are Differentially Expressed In Y831f Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, all three of these critical growth-associated genes were altered in expression in a manner that would predict increased growth of the Y831F mutant plants. Only IPS1 is regulated by BR signaling in wild-type plants (Table III), but even with this gene the expression is modulated to a greater extent in the Y831F plants.Because microarrays can be very reliable for identifying differentially expressed genes when fold changes are generally large (Shi et al, 2008), as in this study, we did not consider it essential to evaluate changes in gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR using the same samples. In future studies, it will certainly be of interest to examine the expression of key genes identified in this study under a variety of different conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%