2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The auditory N1 suppression rebounds as prediction persists over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One would expect that P1a decrease would become larger throughout the rest of the sequence, as evidence accumulates and PE reduces. However, this decrease was instead followed by an amplitude increase, in agreement with previous results where similar rebounds in PE-related activity were observed in series of repetitive 6 and regular, predictable stimuli 4 . In those experiments, the first stimulus completely predicted the rest of the sequence, which led authors to hypothesize that the rebound effect could result from the increased confidence in predictions sharpening neural anticipatory activity around the preferred prediction, leading to paradoxical PE increase insofar as predictions are rarely absolutely precise 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One would expect that P1a decrease would become larger throughout the rest of the sequence, as evidence accumulates and PE reduces. However, this decrease was instead followed by an amplitude increase, in agreement with previous results where similar rebounds in PE-related activity were observed in series of repetitive 6 and regular, predictable stimuli 4 . In those experiments, the first stimulus completely predicted the rest of the sequence, which led authors to hypothesize that the rebound effect could result from the increased confidence in predictions sharpening neural anticipatory activity around the preferred prediction, leading to paradoxical PE increase insofar as predictions are rarely absolutely precise 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, this decrease was instead followed by an amplitude increase, in agreement with previous results where similar rebounds in PE-related activity were observed in series of repetitive 6 and regular, predictable stimuli 4 . In those experiments, the first stimulus completely predicted the rest of the sequence, which led authors to hypothesize that the rebound effect could result from the increased confidence in predictions sharpening neural anticipatory activity around the preferred prediction, leading to paradoxical PE increase insofar as predictions are rarely absolutely precise 4 . Our results extend their findings in that in our task observers needed to update their predictions as information accumulated after each new stimulus, given that uncertainty steadily decreased as more items were presented and only the last stimulus in the predictable series became fully predictable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In electrophysiology literature, N1/N1m is known to reflect multiple processes of signaling unspecific changes in the auditory environment (Näätänen and Picton, 1987; Crowley and Colrain, 2004). Mounting evidence of the N1/N1m predictability effect further supports that it indicates the operation of an internal predictive mechanism, as predicted stimuli were associated with robust N1/N1m suppression (Schafer and Marcus, 1973; Schafer et al, 1981; Lange, 2009; Todorovic et al, 2011; Todorovic and de Lange, 2012; SanMiguel et al, 2013; Timm et al, 2013; Hsu et al, 2014a,b, 2016). Our findings confirm previous research by showing that such predictability effects resemble each other in low and high precision contexts, where prediction error is weighted differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Body gestures, facial expressions, and especially finger and hand movements that require a high level of temporal and spatial accuracy are also involved in music perception. This information provides visual cues which assist the intelligibility of music (Thompson et al, 2005;Molnar-Szakacs and Overy, 2006;Repp and Knoblich, 2009;Behne and Wöllner, 2011;Platz and Kopiez, 2012;Maes et al, 2014), as has similarly been observed for speech (Klucharev et al, 2003;Schwartz et al, 2004;Van Wassenhove et al, 2005;Stekelenburg and Vroomen, 2007;Arnal et al, 2009;Pilling, 2009;Paris et al, 2013Paris et al, , 2016aBaart and Samuel, 2015;Biau and Soto-Faraco, 2015;Hsu et al, 2016). For example, in audiovisual (AV) speech a talker's facial articulations begin before the sound onset, providing a perceiver with potential cues to predict the upcoming speech sound, and thereby enhance AV speech perception relative to the audio only (Besle et al, 2004;Schwartz et al, 2004;Paris et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%