2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:euph.0000030668.62653.0d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of culm anatomy with lodging susceptibility in modern spring wheat genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the group of the analyzed varieties, the largest diameter of the first and second internode was observed in common wheat Kontesa (3.510 mm) and winter spelt Poeme (3.513 mm), and the smallest -in spring spelt Wirtas and Rubinas (2.693 and 2.798 mm, respectively). The second internode diameter was larger than the first internode diameter in all evaluated forms, which is a characteristic trait of common wheat and durum wheat (Kelbert et al, 2004a;Segit et al, 2005). The diameter of both internodes is larger in common wheat cultivars that are resistant to lodging than in sensitive varieties (Klebert et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the group of the analyzed varieties, the largest diameter of the first and second internode was observed in common wheat Kontesa (3.510 mm) and winter spelt Poeme (3.513 mm), and the smallest -in spring spelt Wirtas and Rubinas (2.693 and 2.798 mm, respectively). The second internode diameter was larger than the first internode diameter in all evaluated forms, which is a characteristic trait of common wheat and durum wheat (Kelbert et al, 2004a;Segit et al, 2005). The diameter of both internodes is larger in common wheat cultivars that are resistant to lodging than in sensitive varieties (Klebert et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Kelbert et al (2004a) observed considerable differences in stem wall thickness in the second internode region between common wheat cultivars that are resistant and sensitive to lodging (0.75 mm and 0.69 mm, respectively). Similar results were reported in a study of four common wheat genotypes, where a positive correlation was noted between lodging resistance vs. stem wall thickness (R = 0.972) and the weight of three lowest internodes (R = 0.986) (Kong et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations