Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It broadens the traditional additionality concepts by investigating whether policy intervention has led the actors to become more involved in STI-activities. It also assesses whether there have been permanent changes in the conduct of a company, especially in the institutionalization of any 1 ) An overview on the traditional neoclassical rationales for STI-policy is given, for instance, in Stoneman and Vickers (1988) and Sundbo (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It broadens the traditional additionality concepts by investigating whether policy intervention has led the actors to become more involved in STI-activities. It also assesses whether there have been permanent changes in the conduct of a company, especially in the institutionalization of any 1 ) An overview on the traditional neoclassical rationales for STI-policy is given, for instance, in Stoneman and Vickers (1988) and Sundbo (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a risk that the developed product will only meet idiosyncratic demand so that further sales in the market will be limited. This might especially be the case of military demand, as stated, e.g., by Stoneman (1987), Lichtenberg (1989) or James (2004). In addition, the risk that the R&D project will fail…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is wide acceptance of the case for government involvement in the development of technology and in technology change in developing countries, given the many and obvious reasons for market failure (Stoneman and Vickers, 1998). However, Geroski (1990) warns that there is a tendency for the public sector to end up financing second-best projects, especially those seen to be of national prestige.…”
Section: Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%