2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of airborne bacterial and fungal contamination emitted by a municipal landfill site in Northern Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aureobasidium and Acremonium were the least numerous, and accounted for only 2% and 1% of fungal population, respectively. Similar compositions were recorded by other researchers at landfi lls (Kalwasińska et al 2014, Breza-Boruta 2016 or sewage treatment plants (Viegas 2014, Kermani et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Aureobasidium and Acremonium were the least numerous, and accounted for only 2% and 1% of fungal population, respectively. Similar compositions were recorded by other researchers at landfi lls (Kalwasińska et al 2014, Breza-Boruta 2016 or sewage treatment plants (Viegas 2014, Kermani et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This unusual spike 316 in Aspergillus fumigatus during site monitoring may not be unrelated to the property of the 317 waste (waste rich in fungi) tipped at the dumpsite at the time of sampling. Bioaerosols exposure 318 from scavenging and sorting activities accounted for the highest exposure levels at the dumpsite, 319 levels comparable to or higher than other forms waste-to-land treatment of municipal solid waste such as landfilling and open windrow composing reported in some literature (Lis et al, 2004;Odeyemi 2012;Wéry 2014b;Breza-Boruta 2016).…”
Section: Activity-based Air Samplingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A wastewater aeration system plays an important role in the emission of microorganisms to the air. The works of various authors suggest that for reasons of air safety, more favourable is fine-bubble aeration, at which a bioaerosol emission level is lower [19,25,26]. Whereas, in anaerobic or anoxic chambers there is an intense mixing of wastewater, overflowing and turbulence, which causes the formation of considerable amount of harmful bioaerosols.…”
Section: Percentage Of Emission Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%