2001
DOI: 10.1198/10618600152418584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Art of Data Augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
484
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 862 publications
(493 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
484
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the return on an arbitrage portfolio based on portfolios sorted per degree of corporate governance may explain the cross-section of returns of individual stocks. We find supporting evidence for both claims in this research by multiply imputing missing values (Dempster et al, 1977;van Dyk and Meng, 2001). The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introduction supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Also, the return on an arbitrage portfolio based on portfolios sorted per degree of corporate governance may explain the cross-section of returns of individual stocks. We find supporting evidence for both claims in this research by multiply imputing missing values (Dempster et al, 1977;van Dyk and Meng, 2001). The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introduction supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Similar problems occur for the EM algorithm and (Liu, Rubin, and Wu 1998) introduced parameter expansion to speed up the rate of convergence. The idea was quickly applied to Gibbs sampling problems Liu and Wu (1999) and has now been extensively used to develop more efficient mixed-model samplers (e.g., van Dyk and Meng 2001;Gelman, van Dyk, Huang, and Boscardin 2008;Browne, Steele, Golalizadeh, and Green 2009).…”
Section: A5 Parameter Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For general details on PXDA readers are referred to Liu and Wu (1999) and van Dyk and Meng (2001). As conjugate priors do not exist on correlation matrices, PXDA allows an augmentation converting the correlation matrix R into a valid covariance matrix.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%