2000
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.136.6.800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Appropriateness of Curettage and Electrodesiccation for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In skilled hands curettage can approach the effieaey of surgical exeision (1,15,22), with cure rate of 90% or higher. However, for the inexperienced physicians the recurrence rates of over 30% are not uncommon, due to a poor curettage technique or inappropriate selection of patients (15,17,23).,Supervision and more intensive teaching of dermatology residents results in a mucb lower recurrence rates (23) wbieh is supported here by the data showing a greater than 6-fold decrease in relapses wbere the BCC were treated in a setting of a specialized skin cancer unit in our institution. Ctirettage does not seem to be an appropriate modality lor the treatment of recurrent tumours and poses a bigh risk of relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In skilled hands curettage can approach the effieaey of surgical exeision (1,15,22), with cure rate of 90% or higher. However, for the inexperienced physicians the recurrence rates of over 30% are not uncommon, due to a poor curettage technique or inappropriate selection of patients (15,17,23).,Supervision and more intensive teaching of dermatology residents results in a mucb lower recurrence rates (23) wbieh is supported here by the data showing a greater than 6-fold decrease in relapses wbere the BCC were treated in a setting of a specialized skin cancer unit in our institution. Ctirettage does not seem to be an appropriate modality lor the treatment of recurrent tumours and poses a bigh risk of relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The former two treatments are often touted as efficacious and inexpensive; the calcu-lated cost of ED&C is $471 on the face and $392 on an extremity. [17][18][19][20][21] When the cost of initial visit, biopsy, and 5-year follow-up are included (a total of $571.98), the cost of ED&C increases dramatically. 12 These cost calculations include recurrences, which may range from 5.7% to as high as 13.2%, and treatment of such recurrences, which is likely to be with MMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] The types of BCC that should not be treated by CE include large tumors, infiltrating, fibrosing, and recurrent. [12][13][14] Several studies reported by New York University 2,7,9,15,16 showed that cure rates of primary BCC after CE are influenced by operator experience, histopathology, location, and size of the BCC. In 1991, Silverman et al 7 demonstrated that larger lesion, diameter, and high-risk anatomic sites were independent factors for high RR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical excision has been recently indicated as the treatment of choice for most BCCs, and is considered superior to CE in terms of recurrence rate (RR), 1 although critics note that evidence for this statement is lacking. 1,2 In the long experience of one of the authors (T. R-V.), the clinical impression in an academic center is that recurrences after CE for BCC are low, even when located at medium-and high-risk facial sites, where it is generally recommended that CE be avoided. Because CE is a simple and low-cost procedure that can be performed in an ambulatory setting, we consider CE for BCC worthy of further statistical analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%