2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-9255(00)00050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to sustainability assessment of infrastructure development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEA process encompasses the following stages: identifying PPP objectives (screening); setting goals (scoping); selecting indicators (baseline); predicting impacts (scenarios); public consultation and monitoring (ARCE; GULLON, 2000;FINNVEDEN et al, 2003). In the SEA context, Dalkmann et al (2004) recommend the inclusion of techniques of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) to favor the applicability of SEA results in the decisionmaking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEA process encompasses the following stages: identifying PPP objectives (screening); setting goals (scoping); selecting indicators (baseline); predicting impacts (scenarios); public consultation and monitoring (ARCE; GULLON, 2000;FINNVEDEN et al, 2003). In the SEA context, Dalkmann et al (2004) recommend the inclusion of techniques of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) to favor the applicability of SEA results in the decisionmaking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Canadian Cabinet Directive for the assessment of PPPs notes that SEAs should be conducted in support of sustainable development and SEA literature points out that sustainability considerations are core to SEA (Arce and Gullón, 2000;White and Noble, 2012). The Update scoping document and panels used at the open house sessions do not mention sustainability, interviewed participants also noted this as a key omission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the narrow focus of this tool is seen as inadequate for advancing general (and proactive) policy objectives, such as sustainability (Arce & Gull6n, 2000;Shepherd & Ortolano, 1996). EIA is seen as negative and critical; "It does not generate solutions, it sets limitations or requirements on what can be done" (Holtz, 1990, p. 103).…”
Section: Environmental Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%