Introduction/Objective. Body fat percentage (BFP) is the most reliable
indicator of a nutritional status. For clinical practice it is important but
scarcely investigated whether to exclusively use contemporary methods of BFP
measurement, or classic anthropometric methods are also reliable. The aim was
to investigate the correlation between the results of BFP measuring using a
contemporary method of bioimpedance (Bio) and classic methods of skin fold
thickness (SFT) and body mass index (BMI). Method. There were 279 patients of
the Dietetic Counseling Center of the Institute for Public Health in Nis who
were included in the research during 2015. Body fat percentage was determined
using three classic anthropometric methods of ST over the triceps, and the
scapula and BMI. Apparatus OMRON BF 302 was used for BFP measuring with
bioimpedance method. Results. Using a one factorial analysis of variance we
found a statistically significant difference between the mean values of the
BFP obtained with bioimpedance and with anthropometric methods (F = 24.19, p
< 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant difference
between the BFP determined with bioimpedance and SFT over the triceps and the
scapula, while the anthropometric method based on BMI gave the results
similar to those from bioimpedance. Conclusion. We show that the most
reliable anthropometric method of determination of BFP is that based on BMI,
as its results correlate best with those obtained with a contemporary method
of bioimpedance. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and
Technological Development, Grant no. TR37016]