1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02388652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anorectal sphincter after rectal pull-through surgery for anorectal anomalies: MRI evaluation

Abstract: The puborectalis muscle sling was evaluated with MRI in 10 pediatric patients who had rectal pull-through surgery for anorectal anomalies. MRI (1.5T) demonstrated the puborectalis muscle equally or better than CT in 5 patients who had both CT and MRI. The amount of puborectalis muscle mass and the location of the pulled-through intestine in relation to the puborectalis sling was well shown with MRI. Our study suggests that MRI can be reliably substituted for CT in the majority of these patients, to assist in p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controversy still exists concerning the methods includ ing barium enema, anorectal manometries, CT or MRI to evaluate the long-term results [3,9], A satisfactory barium enema combined with absence of subjective criteria formed the adequate answer in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy still exists concerning the methods includ ing barium enema, anorectal manometries, CT or MRI to evaluate the long-term results [3,9], A satisfactory barium enema combined with absence of subjective criteria formed the adequate answer in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies use subjective, visual evaluation of the sphincter muscle complex without measurements [14,20,31], whereas others use a comparison with MRI studies in patients without anorectal disease [29]. Only Vade et al have studied the age-variable normal thickness of the puborectalis muscle on CT examinations done for reasons other than anorectal malformations [23]. They detected a progressive increase in puborectalis muscle thickness with age, and selected a thickness measurement of 2.5 mm as the lower limit of normal in children less than 2 months of age.…”
Section: Mr Imaging Of the Anorectal Malformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface MRI has been extensively used in defining the level of congenital anorectal malformations, the presence or absence of fistulae, associated urological abnormalities and the nature of coincident spinal dysraphism [15][16][17]. This modality has been used in the postoperative assessment of patients particularly following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty with specific emphasis on the extent of development of the puborectalis sling which appears to correlate with functional outcome [18][19][20]. Recently, the endoanal receiver coil has been used in the assessment of the postoperative case where T1-weighted and STIR (short tau inversion recovery) sequences in the transverse and coronal views provide an impression of the amount of postoperative scarring and IAS/EAS defects, both correlating with clinical outcome [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%