2007
DOI: 10.1177/1049732307308304
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Mixing Methods: An Analysis of Combining Traditional and Autoethnographic Approaches

Abstract: Although mixed- and multiple-method research designs are currently gaining momentum and popularity, it is essential that researchers undertake a critical analysis of the process of mixing "mainstream" research designs with newer methods before commencing. In ethnography, not only are there multiple approaches to data collection, but each approach also spans the competing paradigms, thus making the term mainstream ambiguous because these mainstream techniques are reasonably different from one another. When crit… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
51
8
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
0

Year Published

Range
2008
2008
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
56
5
2

Relationship

0
63

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 63 publications

(35 citation statements)
references

References 44 publications

1
34
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is appreciating that now more and more papers on the topic and which have used a mixed approach are getting published. A mixed approach further validates the results and increases the generalizability of the study (Malina et al , 2011; O’Byrne, 2007). Overall, the research on Muslim entrepreneurship has still not reached a stage of conversion where it is possible to draw concrete implications for a larger population.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directions
supporting
confidence: 54%