2005
DOI: 10.1177/030857590502900203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adoption and Children Act 2002: A Critical Examination

Abstract: The Adoption and Children Act 2002, due to come fully into force on 30 December 2005, effects a long-needed and radical reform of adoption law. The Act has had a very lengthy gestation and is widely regarded as being long overdue. After setting the reforms in a general historical and policy context, Caroline Ball examines, critically, the main provisions of the Act.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Adoption and Children Act 2002 introduced reforms to the law to recognize the changed nature of adoption practice and reflects a long overdue and radical reform of adoption law in the UK (Ball 2005). This legislation places new duties on local authorities to ensure greater consistency and quality of service in adoption support as well as in care planning, and specifies that contact issues have to be thoroughly explored prior to the making of an adoption order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Adoption and Children Act 2002 introduced reforms to the law to recognize the changed nature of adoption practice and reflects a long overdue and radical reform of adoption law in the UK (Ball 2005). This legislation places new duties on local authorities to ensure greater consistency and quality of service in adoption support as well as in care planning, and specifies that contact issues have to be thoroughly explored prior to the making of an adoption order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rate was dismal. In England and Wales during this period, only 2.4 percent or 912 successful matches were recorded (Ball, 2005;Triseliotis et al, 2005). As a result, birth relatives, especially birth mothers, remained highly dissatisfied with the adoption contact register.…”
Section: The Children Act 1989mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, it was, at least in part, a response to concerns about children 'drifting' or 'languishing' in the care system with no clear plan for their future (Parker, 1999: 3;Rowe and Lambert, 1973;Thomas, 2013: 16). Changing social factors, such as the availability of more effective means of contraception, the legalisation of abortion and the increased availability of support for single mothers, also meant that fewer relinquished babies were available, but this was not matched by a reduction in childless couples wishing to adopt (Ball, 2005;Triseliotis, Shireman and Hundleby, 1997). Therefore, some prospective adopters became more receptive to considering the adoption of non-infants as a means to create or add to their family (Ball, 2005;Triseliotis, Shireman and Hundleby, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%