1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The acetabular labral tear: An arthroscopic classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
141
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
141
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Incised labrum: an anterior radial labral tear created by cutting the anterior labrum with a scalpel to the bony edge of the acetabulum; an anterior tear is the most common labrum tear. [20][21][22] For a right hip, the tear location was at the 2 to 3 o'clock anteriorly with the position of the transverse acetabular ligament defined as at 6 o'clock. 20 8.…”
Section: Experimental Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incised labrum: an anterior radial labral tear created by cutting the anterior labrum with a scalpel to the bony edge of the acetabulum; an anterior tear is the most common labrum tear. [20][21][22] For a right hip, the tear location was at the 2 to 3 o'clock anteriorly with the position of the transverse acetabular ligament defined as at 6 o'clock. 20 8.…”
Section: Experimental Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Lage et al 41 found that radial flap tears were the most common type and defined them as having a disruption of the free margin of the labrum. Radial fibrillation involves fraying of the free margin and was associated with degenerative joint disease.…”
Section: Types Of Labral Tearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, an analysis of the most frequently cited articles in orthopaedics [7] and in some sub-specialties [8][9][10] shows that the introduction of a frequently used classification or score is a major factor associated with a large number of citations and a large citation density, mainly because such classifications or scores are commonly used in the methodology of other studies. Among the top 50 most frequently cited Latin-American orthopaedic articles, only one article described a new classification [12]; that article had the second largest number of citations in our list. The absence of more articles introducing new classifications may be one possible explanation of the relative dearth of citations for articles originating from Latin-America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%